Hmm, I'm not sure about the malware part. Does that mean the exploit can only do damage if it downloads additional malware? I'll have to think that one through.
I think the key here is whether the exploit can be launched just by previewing the attachment. That seems like the most likely scenario, so I'll go with option D.
I'm going with A and D too. Previewing an attachment is just asking for trouble, especially if it's got an exploit hiding in there. Better safe than sorry, you know?
Ha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally clicked on a virus link and my computer went haywire. Luckily, I think A and D are the right answers here. Gotta be vigilant with those email attachments, folks!
Hmm, I'm not sure about C - I thought buffer overflows were just one way exploits could work, not a requirement. But A and D sound like the right picks to me.
Wow, this is a tricky one! I think the answer is A and D - the exploit can work if the right application is installed, and just previewing the attachment could launch it. Gotta be careful with those sketchy email attachments, am I right?
Chaya
5 days agoCarman
11 days agoDorothy
17 days agoOlive
22 days agoFidelia
27 days agoSue
1 month agoAlysa
1 month agoDomingo
2 months agoBeatriz
2 months agoMarvel
2 months agoJovita
3 months agoDomingo
3 months agoBarrett
3 months agoKristian
3 months agoXochitl
2 months agoBeatriz
3 months agoDana
3 months agoJustine
2 months ago