Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSC Topic 3 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's Palo Alto Networks Certified Network Security Consultant exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 3
[All Palo Alto Networks Certified Network Security Consultant Questions]

Which three user authentication services can be modified in to provide the Palo Alto Networks NGFW with both username and role names? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chauncey
11 days ago
Yeah, TACACS+ is a solid option too. I'm just hoping they don't throw us a curve ball and include something obscure like Kerberos. That would really put my authentication protocol knowledge to the test!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
11 days ago
Wait, isn't PAP like, the most basic authentication protocol out there? I don't think that would be a good fit for the Palo Alto NGFW. But I could be wrong, so I'm open to input from the group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
12 days ago
Good point. SAML does seem like a more logical choice compared to RADIUS. Although, TACACS+ could also potentially work since it's often used for network access control and can provide user role information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
13 days ago
I agree with you on LDAP and Kerberos, but I'm not sure about RADIUS. Wouldn't SAML be a better choice since it's a popular identity federation protocol that can pass along user attributes like roles?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
13 days ago
Ooh, TACACS+ - I remember that one from my networking class. I think that might be a good choice too, along with LDAP and SAML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
14 days ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. It's testing our knowledge of user authentication services and which ones can provide both username and role information to the Palo Alto Networks NGFW. I'm thinking LDAP, RADIUS, and Kerberos are the three correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
14 days ago
I'm leaning towards LDAP, RADIUS, and Kerberos. But I'm curious to see if anyone has a different perspective on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
15 days ago
SAML, LDAP, and RADIUS - those are my picks. I feel pretty confident about those, but I'm open to hearing what the others think too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
17 days ago
Hmm, I think I've worked with a few of these authentication services before, but I'm not sure which ones can be modified for the Palo Alto NGFW. This is going to require some careful thinking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
19 days ago
Man, this question looks tricky. I'm not sure I know the exact answer, but I'm going to give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel