Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSC Topic 2 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCNSC exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 2
[All PCNSC Questions]

Your customer has asked you to set up tunnel monitoring on an IPsec VPN tunnel between two offices What three steps are needed to set up tunnel monitoring? (Choose three)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Fatima at Mar 20, 2024, 08:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCNSC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Raina
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) 1 because the priority for the passive firewall should be lower than the active firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 months ago
I agree with Kassandra, the passive firewall should have a priority of 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
10 months ago
Actually, I believe the passive firewall will have a priority of 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
I think the passive firewall will have a priority of 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
10 months ago
I agree with The priority for the passive firewall should be lower than the active one to ensure proper failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
11 months ago
I think the priority for the passive firewall would be 1 as well. It needs to be lower than the active firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
Hmm, maybe you're right. Let's discuss this further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
12 months ago
I disagree with I believe the priority for the passive firewall would be 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
12 months ago
I think the priority for the passive firewall would be 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
1 years ago
Okay, let's look at the options. A and B seem too low, while D is the max priority. I'm thinking C, 90, might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
1 years ago
Yep, that's my thinking too. The passive firewall needs to have a lower priority than the active one, so it can take over if the active one fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
1 years ago
I agree, the phrasing could be better. But let's think this through - if the active firewall has a priority of 100, then the passive one should have a lower priority, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
1 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think the key here is understanding how the priority works in Palo Alto active/passive HA setup.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
12 months ago
I don't think it's 255, that seems too high for the passive firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
12 months ago
D) 255
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be 1 for the passive firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
12 months ago
B) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
12 months ago
I believe it is actually 90 for the passive firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
12 months ago
C) 90
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
12 months ago
I think the priority for the passive firewall is 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
12 months ago
A) 0
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel