New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PCCSE Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All PCCSE Questions]

The security team wants to target a CNAF policy for specific running Containers. How should the administrator scope the policy to target the Containers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Joesph at Aug 31, 2023, 05:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCCSE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Truman
3 months ago
I thought Defender names were the way to go, but maybe not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
3 months ago
Host names? That's not very specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
4 months ago
Wait, can you really scope by image names? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
4 months ago
I think scoping to namespaces makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that scoping to Defender names was mentioned in our study materials, but I can't remember the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
4 months ago
I feel like scoping to host names could be too broad. We need to be more specific to target the right containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about targeting image names in a similar practice question. That could be an option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
I think scoping the policy to namespaces might be the right approach since it allows for better organization of containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
5 months ago
I'm not totally confident on this, but I think the best option here is to scope the policy to the host names where the target containers are running. That way, the policy will apply to all the containers on those specific hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if scoping to namespaces is the right approach, since the question specifically mentions targeting "specific running Containers". Maybe I should look into scoping to image names or Defender names instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
5 months ago
I think the best approach here is to scope the policy to the namespaces where the target containers are running. That way, the policy will apply to all the containers in those namespaces without having to list out each individual container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to scope the policy to the specific container images that the security team wants to target. That way, the policy will only apply to the containers running those images, and not affect any other containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
5 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The question is asking about the expected behavior when the disk space limit is reached. Based on that, I think the answer is D - the agents will delete the oldest files to free up space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
5 months ago
I'm a bit nervous about this one. Too many numbers to track - variance, correlation, dividends. Need to stay calm and methodical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
5 months ago
The key is understanding the different employee types. I'll quickly recall the definitions of exempt vs. nonexempt before choosing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
10 months ago
What, no option to scope it to the color of the containers? That's the only way I'm passing this exam!
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
8 months ago
C) scope the policy to Defender names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
B) scope the policy to namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
9 months ago
A) scope the policy to Image names.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laura
10 months ago
Defender names? Really? That's like trying to herd cats. Namespaces all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
10 months ago
Defender names? Really? That's like trying to herd cats. Namespaces all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
C) scope the policy to Defender names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
10 months ago
B) scope the policy to namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
10 months ago
A) scope the policy to Image names.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theron
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with option B. Namespaces just make the most sense for this use case. Anything else would be like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
But targeting Image names would ensure specific running Containers are covered, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe scoping the policy to namespaces would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
Hmm, I think scoping the policy to namespaces would be the way to go. That's the most logical approach to target specific running containers.
upvoted 0 times
Salina
9 months ago
Scoping the policy to Defender names might be too specific, namespaces are more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
9 months ago
I think scoping the policy to Image names could also work, but namespaces seem more precise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
9 months ago
Definitely, targeting specific running containers through namespaces is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
9 months ago
I agree, scoping the policy to namespaces makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
I think the administrator should scope the policy to Image names.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel