Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam NGFW-Engineer Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's NGFW-Engineer exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 2
[All NGFW-Engineer Questions]

A multinational organization wants to use the Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) to aggregate identity data from multiple sources (on premises AD, Azure AD, Okta) while enforcing strict data isolation for different regional business units. Each region's firewalls, managed via Panorama, must only receive the user and group information relevant to that region. The organization aims to minimize administrative overhead while meeting data sovereignty requirements.

Which approach achieves this segmentation of identity data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To meet the requirement of data isolation for different regional business units while minimizing administrative overhead, the best approach is to establish separate Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) tenants for each business unit. Each tenant would be integrated with the relevant identity sources (such as on-premises AD, Azure AD, and Okta) for that specific region. This ensures that the identity data for each region is kept isolated and only relevant user and group data is distributed to the respective regional firewalls.

By maintaining a strict one-to-one mapping between CIE tenants and business units, the organization ensures that each region's firewall only receives the user and group data relevant to that region, thus meeting data sovereignty requirements and minimizing administrative complexity.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlota
22 days ago
Option B is the way to go, no doubt. Separate tenants FTW! Less complexity, more control - perfect for meeting those data sovereignty requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
23 days ago
Haha, Option A is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Relying on firewall policies to restrict access? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
1 months ago
Option C is an interesting idea, but it might add too much overhead to the regional firewalls. I think the CIE-based approaches (B or D) are better solutions here.
upvoted 0 times
Jaleesa
2 days ago
Option B sounds like a good way to keep things organized by business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
4 days ago
Definitely, it would make it easier to manage and ensure data isolation for each region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
10 days ago
I agree, having separate CIE tenants for each business unit seems like the most efficient way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
22 days ago
Option B sounds like the best approach. It keeps things organized by business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
1 months ago
That's a good point, Valentine. Option D does seem like a good balance between centralization and data isolation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. It allows for centralized management while still filtering and redistributing only relevant data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Segmenting the single tenant makes more sense than creating multiple tenants, and it still allows you to control the data flow effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Eleonore
22 days ago
I agree, having one tenant with segmented data seems like the most efficient way to manage identity data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
27 days ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. It allows for segmentation within the single tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanesa
2 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to achieve the data isolation requirements. Separate tenants for each business unit is a clean and manageable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
12 hours ago
Definitely, having a one-to-one mapping of tenant to business unit simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
2 days ago
I agree, it would make it easier to control access to specific identity data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
22 days ago
Separate tenants for each business unit is a clean and manageable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
29 days ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to achieve the data isolation requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 months ago
And it ensures that each region's firewall only receives the relevant user and group data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 months ago
It definitely helps with maintaining a strict one-to-one mapping of tenant to business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 months ago
I agree, having separate tenants for each business unit makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
1 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to achieve the data isolation requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. It ensures strict data isolation for each regional business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel