Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Which statement applies to Log Collector Groups?
D) The maximum number of Log Collectors in a Log Collector Group is 18 plus two hot spares.
A) Log redundancy is available only if each Log Collector has the same amount of total disk storage.
B) Enabling redundancy increases the log processing traffic in a Collector Group by 50%.
C) In any single Collector Group, all the Log Collectors must run on the same Panorama model.

Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's NGFW-Engineer exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 2
[All NGFW-Engineer Questions]

Which statement applies to Log Collector Groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The maximum number of Log Collectors that can be added to a Log Collector Group is 18 plus 2 hot spares, ensuring redundancy and availability in case of failure. This allows for a total of up to 20 Log Collectors in a group, providing sufficient scalability and reliability for log collection.


by Han at May 02, 2026, 08:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NGFW-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shaunna
14 hours ago
I feel A could mislead some.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 days ago
Still, D is more comprehensive overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
11 days ago
True, but redundancy is about storage too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
16 days ago
But A doesn't mention the model requirement. D covers that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
21 days ago
I'm leaning towards A. Disk storage is crucial for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
26 days ago
I agree, D seems accurate. It's a clear limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 month ago
I think D is correct. 18 plus 2 spares makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
1 month ago
A is misleading, redundancy doesn't depend solely on disk size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 month ago
Wait, are you sure about C? That seems too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
B sounds right, traffic definitely increases with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
I thought redundancy was more flexible than that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
2 months ago
D is correct, max is 18 plus 2 spares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
2 months ago
I remember that all Log Collectors in a group need to be compatible, but I can't remember if they all have to be the same model or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
4 months ago
I’m uncertain about the processing traffic increase; 50% sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if that’s the right figure for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
I feel like I saw a question about the maximum number of Log Collectors before, and I think it was related to 18 plus spares, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
4 months ago
I think I remember something about redundancy, but I'm not sure if it really depends on the disk storage of each Log Collector.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel