Discuss Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Exam Topic 2 Question 20

Which statement applies to Log Collector Groups?

ALog redundancy is available only if each Log Collector has the same amount of total disk storage.

BEnabling redundancy increases the log processing traffic in a Collector Group by 50%.

CIn any single Collector Group, all the Log Collectors must run on the same Panorama model.

DThe maximum number of Log Collectors in a Log Collector Group is 18 plus two hot spares.

Suggested Answer: D

The maximum number of Log Collectors that can be added to a Log Collector Group is 18 plus 2 hot spares, ensuring redundancy and availability in case of failure. This allows for a total of up to 20 Log Collectors in a group, providing sufficient scalability and reliability for log collection.

Get Premium NGFW-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

24 comments · newest first

Tony 4 days ago

A is definitely wrong. Redundancy is more complex.

Raul 10 days ago

I lean towards D too. It’s a clear limit.

Lawanda 15 days ago

C is tricky. Different models can still work together.

Amira 20 days ago

B is misleading. Traffic increase isn’t that high.

Lindsay 25 days ago

A seems off. Redundancy isn’t just about storage size.

Elin 1 month ago

I agree, D sounds right. It matches what I read.

Susana 1 month ago

I think D is correct. 18 plus 2 spares makes sense.

Lashawnda 1 month ago

Exactly, clarity matters in these questions.

Shaunna 2 months ago

I feel A could mislead some.

Tasia 2 months ago

Still, D is more comprehensive overall.

Theodora 2 months ago

True, but redundancy is about storage too.

Lashawnda 2 months ago

But A doesn't mention the model requirement. D covers that.

Shaunna 2 months ago

I'm leaning towards A. Disk storage is crucial for redundancy.

Tasia 2 months ago

I agree, D seems accurate. It's a clear limit.

Theodora 3 months ago

I think D is correct. 18 plus 2 spares makes sense.

Rodney 3 months ago

A is misleading, redundancy doesn't depend solely on disk size.

Kristel 3 months ago

Wait, are you sure about C? That seems too restrictive.

Rodrigo 3 months ago

B sounds right, traffic definitely increases with redundancy.

Teddy 3 months ago

I thought redundancy was more flexible than that!

Delisa 3 months ago

D is correct, max is 18 plus 2 spares.

Brandon 4 months ago

I remember that all Log Collectors in a group need to be compatible, but I can't remember if they all have to be the same model or not.

Zoila 5 months ago

I’m uncertain about the processing traffic increase; 50% sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if that’s the right figure for redundancy.

Lai 5 months ago

I feel like I saw a question about the maximum number of Log Collectors before, and I think it was related to 18 plus spares, but I can't recall the exact details.

Jackie 6 months ago

I think I remember something about redundancy, but I'm not sure if it really depends on the disk storage of each Log Collector.

Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion