New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks NGFW-Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's NGFW-Engineer exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All NGFW-Engineer Questions]

Which statement applies to Log Collector Groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The maximum number of Log Collectors that can be added to a Log Collector Group is 18 plus 2 hot spares, ensuring redundancy and availability in case of failure. This allows for a total of up to 20 Log Collectors in a group, providing sufficient scalability and reliability for log collection.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ruth
1 day ago
I disagree, I thought redundancy was more about performance than disk space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
6 days ago
I think D is correct, 18 plus 2 hot spares sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
12 days ago
Hmm, I wonder if the exam will ask about the optimal snack choice for long Panorama troubleshooting sessions. Gotta keep those energy levels up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
17 days ago
A) Log redundancy is available only if each Log Collector has the same amount of total disk storage. Seems like a fair requirement to ensure consistent data replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
22 days ago
B) Enabling redundancy increases the log processing traffic in a Collector Group by 50%. Wow, that's a significant overhead! Gotta weigh the benefits carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
27 days ago
D) The maximum number of Log Collectors in a Log Collector Group is 18 plus two hot spares. Seems like a reasonable limit to maintain manageability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
1 month ago
I definitely remember that there’s a limit on the number of Log Collectors, but I can't recall if it's 18 or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 month ago
I feel like all the Log Collectors in a group do need to be the same model, but I might be mixing that up with another concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 month ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that redundancy does increase traffic, but I can't remember the exact percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the answer choices that I'm confident are incorrect, then focus in on the remaining ones to try and determine the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording on some of these answer choices. I'll need to re-read them a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 months ago
Okay, let me see. I know redundancy is important for log collection, so I'll focus on that part of the question first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 months ago
I think D is correct. 18 plus 2 spares makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
2 months ago
C) In any single Collector Group, all the Log Collectors must run on the same Panorama model. This makes sense to ensure compatibility and consistent performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
2 months ago
I remember something about log redundancy, but I'm not sure if it depends on the total disk storage of each collector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards D too. It’s a clear limit in the specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with the details of Log Collector Groups, so I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
3 months ago
I think I'll start by reading through the question carefully and trying to understand the key concepts around Log Collector Groups.
upvoted 0 times
Alethea
3 months ago
I’m confused. Can someone explain why B is a good choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel