Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

How can we limit the number of records returned by an Aggregate?
A) Use the Max. Records property.
B) Use the Length value.
C) Use the Count value.
D) Use Sorting.

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Associate-Reactive-Developer exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 5
[All Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions]

How can we limit the number of records returned by an Aggregate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rosamond at Aug 01, 2025, 02:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fabiola
9 months ago
Wait, can Sorting really limit records? That’s new to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
9 months ago
B seems off, Length value doesn’t limit records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
9 months ago
I thought it was C, Count value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
A is correct, but I’ve seen people confuse it with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
9 months ago
Definitely A, Max. Records is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
10 months ago
I feel like the Length value might be related, but I can't quite remember how it fits into limiting records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
10 months ago
Sorting seems like it could help, but I don't recall it being a direct method to limit records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question where we had to use the Count value, but I don't think that's for limiting records specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
10 months ago
I think we can limit records using the Max. Records property, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C, using the Count value. That seems like it could be a way to limit the number of records returned, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
For this type of question, I usually try to think about the specific functionality of each option. Using sorting doesn't seem like it would directly limit the number of records, so I'll rule that one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the Length or Count values would actually limit the number of records returned. Maybe I should re-read the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the Max. Records property is used to limit the number of records returned, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
Hmm, I think this question is asking about how to limit the number of records returned by an Aggregate. I'll need to think carefully about the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
12 months ago
I believe using Sorting can also help limit the number of records returned by an Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
12 months ago
I agree with Clay, using the Max. Records property makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if C) Use the Count value is quite right. Wouldn't that just give me the total number of records? I'll go with A) to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Giuseppe
12 months ago
I think A) Use the Max. Records property is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clay
1 year ago
I think we can limit the number of records by using the Max. Records property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
1 year ago
B) Use the Length value? Really? That doesn't seem like a valid way to limit the number of records. I'm confident A) is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 year ago
D) Use Sorting seems like an interesting option, but I'm not sure if it actually limits the number of records. I'll go with A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A) Use the Max. Records property. It's the most straightforward way to limit the number of records returned by an Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
12 months ago
I think using Sorting can also help in limiting the number of records returned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
1 year ago
I agree, using the Max. Records property is the best way to limit the number of records returned.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel