Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle 1Z0-078 Exam - Topic 11 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-078 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 11
[All 1Z0-078 Questions]

Disk group DGRP1 has these attributes:

1. Normal redundancy

2. Two failure groups FG1 and FG2 with two disks each

3. Compatibility settings set to 19.0

The FG1 failure group goes offline due to hardware failure.

Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Melinda at Jan 22, 2025, 02:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-078 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Luisa
5 months ago
FG2 will handle new allocations until FG1 is restored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
5 months ago
I think transactions will still work, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
5 months ago
Wait, are new allocation units really not mirrored?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
6 months ago
Totally agree, redundancy drops until FG1 is back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
6 months ago
FG1 going offline means redundancy is affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether transactions would fail or not. I thought they could still operate as long as one failure group is up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the redundancy was affected by a failure group going offline. I feel like option B might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
6 months ago
I think new allocation units are still mirrored in FG2, but I can't recall if changes are tracked or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
7 months ago
I remember something about how redundancy works, but I'm not sure if it lowers immediately when a failure group goes offline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
7 months ago
This looks straightforward to me. I think I've got a good handle on how disk groups and failure groups work, so I should be able to nail this one down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the compatibility settings and how that might factor in. I'll need to review my notes on that to make sure I understand the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
7 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by eliminating the obviously wrong answers, then focus on comparing the remaining options to see which two best match the scenario described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key information seems to be that one of the failure groups (FG1) went offline due to hardware failure. I'll need to think through how that would impact the redundancy and mirroring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details about the disk group and failure groups to figure out the correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
1 year ago
A sounds like the most logical answer to me. Keeping the data mirrored in the other failure group until the first one is back online makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
11 months ago
B) The redundancy is lowered until the FGl failgroup is restored and the disk group resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
12 months ago
A) New allocation units are mirrored in the FG2 failure group until FGl is restored and the disk group resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paul
1 year ago
Haha, D made me chuckle. Transactions failing? That's just a typical day in the life of a DBA, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Lina
10 months ago
Haha, D made me chuckle. Transactions failing? That's just a typical day in the life of a DBA, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
10 months ago
B) The redundancy is lowered until the FGl failgroup is restored and the disk group resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
12 months ago
A) New allocation units are mirrored in the FG2 failure group until FGl is restored and the disk group resynchronized-
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renato
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Does that mean new data isn't mirrored, but changes are tracked? Seems like a strange behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
12 months ago
User2: B) The redundancy is lowered until the FGl failgroup is restored and the disk group resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
12 months ago
User1: A) New allocation units are mirrored in the FG2 failure group until FGl is restored and the disk group resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmanuel
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. If one failure group goes offline, the redundancy is indeed lowered until it's restored and the disk group is resynchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the correct answers are C and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
I agree with Adell. The redundancy is definitely lowered until FG1 is restored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel