Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-076 Topic 7 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-076 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 7
[All 1Z0-076 Questions]

You must design an Oracle Data Guard configuration for a DSS database that meets these permanent

requirements:

1. Creating and maintaining bitmap indexes should not impact the performance of the primary database.

2. Creating and maintaining materialized views should not impact the performance of the primary database.

Additionally, there are these requirements, only one of which is ever done at any one time:

1. It should be possible to apply designated patches with a minimum amount of downtime.

2. Upgrading to a new database release should be performed with the least possible amount of downtime.

3. New application software releases should be tested against an exact and up-to-date replica of the primary database.

Which configuration meets these requirements with the fewest of databases?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Logical standby databases allow the execution of DDL and DML operations, which makes them suitable for maintaining bitmap indexes and materialized views without affecting the performance of the primary database .

Logical standby databases can be used for performing rolling upgrades and patching with minimum downtime, meeting another requirement .

They also enable the testing of new application software releases against an up-to-date replica of the primary database, fulfilling the last requirement.

Other configurations involving physical standby databases or combinations of logical and physical standby databases might not meet all the specified requirements as efficiently or with the same level of performance isolation for the primary database.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Felicidad
1 months ago
Option E for the win! Maintaining an exact replica of the primary database for testing new applications sounds like a dream come true. *wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
1 months ago
Hmm, Option D with two physical standby databases? That's a lot of databases, but it might be overkill. I'd prefer a more streamlined solution.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
3 days ago
Yeah, that way you have both types of standby databases for different scenarios without having too many.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
25 days ago
I think Option E with one logical and one physical standby database could be a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francene
1 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Two logical standby databases would provide the necessary flexibility and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Howard
6 days ago
Having multiple standby databases definitely helps in maintaining an up-to-date replica for testing new application software releases against the primary database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
7 days ago
I think having both logical and physical standby databases would be the best option to meet all the requirements without impacting the primary database performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
16 days ago
I agree, having two logical standby databases would definitely provide the flexibility needed for applying patches with minimal downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 months ago
I'd go with Option C. A single physical standby database should be able to handle the patch application and database upgrades with minimal downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
Option E seems like the most comprehensive solution. Having both a logical and physical standby database should meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
2 months ago
But wouldn't having two physical standby databases provide better redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
I agree with Noah, having both logical and physical standby databases covers all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
2 months ago
I think option E would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel