New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Consider the following diagram:

Which statement is always true about this diagram?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The image showcases a state machine named 'BehaviorA'. It consists of two states: s1 and s2. There's also a transition labeled 'signalA' connecting these states. However, a guard condition, '[x > 0]' is placed on the transition. This indicates that the signalA event will only trigger the transition if the expression x > 0 evaluates to true.

In the scenario you described, the state machine is currently in state s1, and the value of x is 0. Since the guard condition '[x > 0]' is not satisfied (because x is 0), the signalA event will not trigger a transition to state s2.

Here's a breakdown of why other options are incorrect:

Option A (The state machine will transition to state s2 and execute ActivityA during the transition) is not valid because the guard condition prevents the transition.

Option B (The state machine will execute ActivityA and remain in state s1) is incorrect as ActivityA is only associated with the transition, which isn't happening in this case.

Option D (The state machine will remain in state s1, and processing of the signalA event occurrence will be deferred until either the value of x changes or the state machine changes state) is not entirely accurate. While the state machine remains in s1, the processing of the signalA event is consumed immediately, not deferred.

Therefore, considering the state machine's visual representation and the guard condition, option C best describes the state machine's behavior. The signalA event is acknowledged but has no effect because the transition requirements aren't met.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elin
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
B is too specific, could be more than 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
D seems a bit off, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
4 months ago
I think C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
4 months ago
A is definitely not true, can't have infinite objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the exact numbers mentioned in option B. I thought there could be more than 5 G objects, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
4 months ago
I feel like option D could be true since it mentions the possibility of G objects existing without H objects. That seems plausible based on what I practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
4 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the relationship between H and G objects was discussed. It might help to think about the limits on G objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
5 months ago
I remember studying about object associations, but I'm not entirely sure if there can be infinitely many H objects in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
5 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the relationships shown in the diagram, not just the individual objects. The question is asking about a statement that is always true, so I'll need to consider all the possibilities and eliminate the ones that might not hold true in every case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. The diagram shows that each H object is connected to one or more G objects, but I'm not sure if that means there are infinitely many H objects or if the number of G objects per H object is limited. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
5 months ago
The diagram shows some kind of relationship between H and G objects inside a package, but I'm not sure exactly what it means. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the diagram and the answer choices to figure out which statement is always true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
10 months ago
Ah, the old 'no H object associated with G' trick. Classic UML trickery, I'm onto you, option D!
upvoted 0 times
Ludivina
9 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think option B could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
9 months ago
User 2: Really? I was leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
10 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
10 months ago
Infinitely many H objects? Sounds like a bug waiting to happen. I'll steer clear of option A, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
10 months ago
I'm feeling adventurous today, let's go with option B! Between 1 and 5 G objects, what could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
10 months ago
Option C seems like the safest bet here. Gotta love those 'fewer than 5' statements, they're always a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
10 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. 'Fewer than 5' just sounds more reliable in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
10 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the safest choice. It's always good to go with the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
11 months ago
Hmm, this diagram looks like it's trying to confuse me. I'll go with option D - it's the only one that doesn't make any bold claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
11 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel