New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam - Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Consider the following diagram fragment:

What makes this fragment invalid?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: F

In the given UML package diagram fragment, various elements are listed with stereotypes indicating their nature (class, interface). Stereotypes are used in UML to extend the vocabulary of UML in order to create new kinds of building blocks. They are typically enclosed in guillemets ( ).

The last element, 'six', does not have a stereotype indicating whether it's a class, interface, or some other kind of element. This lack of a stereotype leads to ambiguity about the nature of 'six'. Therefore, the fragment is considered invalid due to this omission.

All the other options do not constitute an error in the UML fragment: A) A list of elements is allowed in a package body. B) Visibility is not required for every element, especially within package diagrams. C) Interfaces are allowed in packages. D) Private elements are allowed in a package. E) Protected elements are also allowed in a package.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

F . Element six is missing its stereotype.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Goldie
3 months ago
Not sure about that, I thought interfaces could be in packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
3 months ago
I agree with Kate, visibility is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
3 months ago
Wait, are protected elements really not allowed in a package?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
4 months ago
I think classone missing visibility is a bigger issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
A list of elements is definitely not allowed in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
4 months ago
I definitely remember that stereotypes are important, so element six missing one might be a valid reason for invalidity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
4 months ago
I feel like I read that private elements can be included in lists, but maybe I misunderstood that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where interfaces were mentioned, but I can't recall if they can be in a package or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
5 months ago
I think I remember something about visibility in classes, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about "classone" here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
Ah, the missing stereotype on element six. That could be the issue. I'll make sure to look for any syntax or formatting problems in the diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
5 months ago
Private and protected elements - that's an interesting one. I'll double-check the visibility rules for package contents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the interface in the package. Is that not allowed? I'll have to think through the package structure rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. A list of elements in a package body? That doesn't sound right. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully review the package body rules to figure out what's wrong here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm gonna go with E. Protected elements in a package? That's like putting a lock on your front door and leaving the key under the mat!
upvoted 0 times
Gail
1 year ago
Yeah, that's a good point. I think I'll go with E too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
E) Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
1 year ago
You know what they say, 'if it's not broke, don't fix it.' I'm going with A. A list of elements in a package body? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
1 year ago
Nah, man, it's gotta be B. How can you have a class without a visibility? That's like having a superhero without a cape!
upvoted 0 times
Rory
1 year ago
I agree with you, it has to be B. Classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's D. Private elements are not allowed on the list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
I agree with you, it has to be B. Classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's F. Element six is missing its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
1 year ago
No way, it's definitely E. Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
1 year ago
I think it's actually A. Lists of elements are not allowed in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
No way, it's definitely E. Protected elements are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
1 year ago
I think it's actually C. Interfaces are not allowed in a package.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolland
1 year ago
Hmm, that's an interesting point. I'll have to reconsider my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is F) Element six is missing its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B) classone is missing a visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
1 year ago
Hmm, I think it's option C. An interface in a package body? That's a big no-no!
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
1 year ago
I'm going with option F. Element six needs its stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's option A. Lists of elements are not allowed in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
1 year ago
I think it's option C too. Interfaces shouldn't be in a package body.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel