New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Can State Machine Events have Features?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

State Machine Events in UML are triggers for transitions and do not classify as objects or classifiers; thus they do not inherently have features:

A . Incorrect, because State Machine Events are not treated as classifiers with features.

B . Incorrect, though it hints at an extended use case, State Machine Events do not extend classifiers in standard UML usage.

C . Correct, State Machine Events are not Classifiers and therefore cannot have features such as properties or operations.

D . Incorrect, because UML State Machines certainly have an Event concept, but these Events are not classified as having features.


UML Specification: State Machine chapter, specifically sections discussing the nature of events and triggers.

Further insights can be found in the event and trigger management sections of the UML 2.5 Documentation.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tom
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? I thought State Machines couldn't have features at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
3 months ago
D seems off, UML does have an Event concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
3 months ago
C is definitely wrong, State Machine Events are part of UML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
4 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
4 months ago
A is correct, State Machine Events can have features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the answer is B. It makes sense that they can have features if they extend Classifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Event concept in UML State Machines. I thought they did have it, but maybe I misread something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
4 months ago
I remember studying that State Machine Events are not Classifiers, so I feel like option C might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
5 months ago
I think State Machine Events can have features, but I'm not sure if it's only when they extend Classifier. That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. My understanding is that State Machine Events are not Classifiers, so they shouldn't be able to have Features. But I'll double-check the details before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. State Machine Events can have Features, but only if the Events also extend Classifier. I'm confident that's the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if State Machine Events can have Features or not. I'll have to review the UML specification to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure State Machine Events can have Features, but I'm not 100% certain. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 year ago
Wait, State Machine Events can have Features? I thought they were just for triggering transitions. This UML stuff is getting too complicated for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 year ago
Option D, really? UML State Machines definitely have an Event concept. This question is way too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with option C. State Machine Events are not Classifiers, so they can't have Features. This seems like a pretty straightforward question.
upvoted 0 times
Jackie
1 year ago
Yes, State Machine Events cannot have Features because they are not Classifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
I agree, option C is the correct answer. State Machine Events are not Classifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanesa
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option B is the correct answer. State Machine Events can have Features, but only if they extend Classifier. The UML standard is pretty clear on this.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
I believe option C is the correct answer. State Machine Events cannot have Features because they are not Classifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
1 year ago
I think option A is the correct answer. State Machine Events can have Features without extending Classifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I agree with you, option B is the correct answer. State Machine Events can have Features if they extend Classifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dino
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure State Machine Events can have Features, but I'm not sure about the details. The UML spec should have more information on this.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
1 year ago
Good idea. It's always best to refer to the official documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
That makes sense. I'll check the UML spec for more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
Good idea. It's always best to refer to the official documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
1 year ago
That makes sense. I'll check the UML spec for more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
Yes, they can. But only when the modeled Events also extend Classifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
I think State Machine Events can have Features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
1 year ago
Yes, they can. but only when the modeled Events also extend Classifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 year ago
I think State Machine Events can have Features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel