MENU
Choose the correct answer.
A system engineer specializing in rigid body dynamics wants to model the laws of motion (LOM) so that they may be reused to analyze different types of systems. The LOM consist of the mathematical relations R1 and R2. shown here.
(R1)s=ut + (1/2)at2
(R2) v = u + at
How should the system engineer represent and relate LOM. R1, and R2 in SysML?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
NA
Nadine
11 months ago
I thought we were supposed to create activities, not blocks.
KI
Kimberely
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about using constraint properties for this?
FR
Franchesca
12 months ago
Constraint blocks are definitely the way to go!
SI
Sina
12 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense here.
BU
Buddy
12 months ago
R1 and R2 are equations of motion, so they need proper representation.
AL
Alise
1 year ago
I vaguely recall that constraint blocks are used for defining relationships, but I can't remember if they should be typed by R1 and R2 or if there's another way to do it.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about whether to create actions or properties. I feel like properties might be more appropriate for representing the laws of motion.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between blocks and activities. I feel like constraint blocks might be the right choice here.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how SysML uses blocks and constraints, but I'm not sure if I should use part properties or constraint properties for LOM.
SI
Simona
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to really consider the pros and cons of each option to determine the best technique.
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
I think the key here is to look at the cache settings for the product tiles. Option B and C seem like the most straightforward ways to do that.