Hold on, why aren't there any options for the rate being a constant value? That would be my pick, but I guess the exam writers wanted to make this more complicated.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option F - an upper bound on the number of objects traversing the edge. Seems more realistic than expecting an exact number.
I'm leaning towards Option C. The rate should represent the expected number of changes to an object's value, not the number of objects traversing the edge.
Option D seems the most logical choice here. The rate on an activity edge should specify the expected number of objects traversing the edge per time interval.
Benton
14 days agoSylvie
1 days agoMike
2 days agoGail
26 days agoRodney
3 days agoKanisha
8 days agoJules
1 months agoJill
2 days agoRolland
3 days agoTegan
16 days agoBrendan
26 days agoRusty
27 days agoPaola
1 months agoLisandra
2 months agoXochitl
26 days agoCraig
1 months agoLaticia
2 months agoMammie
2 months agoDetra
2 months agoCeleste
2 months agoCristal
2 months agoCeleste
2 months ago