Hold on, why aren't there any options for the rate being a constant value? That would be my pick, but I guess the exam writers wanted to make this more complicated.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option F - an upper bound on the number of objects traversing the edge. Seems more realistic than expecting an exact number.
I'm leaning towards Option C. The rate should represent the expected number of changes to an object's value, not the number of objects traversing the edge.
Option D seems the most logical choice here. The rate on an activity edge should specify the expected number of objects traversing the edge per time interval.
Benton
2 months agoValda
23 days agoMichael
2 months agoSylvie
2 months agoMike
2 months agoGail
2 months agoFallon
1 months agoRodney
2 months agoKanisha
2 months agoJules
3 months agoRenea
1 months agoGraciela
1 months agoJill
2 months agoRolland
2 months agoTegan
2 months agoBrendan
2 months agoRusty
2 months agoPaola
3 months agoLisandra
3 months agoXochitl
2 months agoCraig
3 months agoLaticia
3 months agoMammie
3 months agoDetra
3 months agoCeleste
3 months agoCristal
4 months agoCeleste
4 months ago