Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Choose the correct answer.Given the following diagram:Assume that all stereotypes required by the SysML-Modehca Transformation specification (if any) have been applied but are not necessarily shown here Assume that FixedWall. ViscoelasticSpring. and RigidMass are fully defined in a Modelica library.What else must be done to get this model ready for solving according to the SysML-Modelica Transformation specification?
A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
B) Provide specific values Nothing else is required, as Kirchhoff's I laws are automatically taken care of consistent with the above ibd
C) Nothing - it is ready as-is
D) Modelica cannot handle this type of nonlinear model

OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer.

Given the following diagram:

Assume that all stereotypes required by the SysML-Modehca Transformation specification (if any) have been applied but are not necessarily shown here Assume that FixedWall. ViscoelasticSpring. and RigidMass are fully defined in a Modelica library.

What else must be done to get this model ready for solving according to the SysML-Modelica Transformation specification?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tammi at Sep 17, 2024, 08:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vanda
9 months ago
D is just wrong, Modelica can handle nonlinear models!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
9 months ago
C is too optimistic, it definitely needs more work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
9 months ago
Wait, B says Kirchhoff's laws are automatic? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
10 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
10 months ago
A needs specific values and equations for Kirchhoff's Laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
10 months ago
I don't recall anything about Modelica being unable to handle nonlinear models, so option D seems unlikely. But I’m still a bit confused about the specifics needed for the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
I thought we learned that models need to be fully defined before solving, so I’m leaning towards option A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we might have covered something about Kirchhoff's laws being automatically handled in a similar practice question. Could that be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to provide specific values for parameters in these models. I think option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the transformation specification carefully and make sure I understand all the requirements before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. Just provide the specific values, and the model should be ready to go. No need to worry about anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. Does Modelica really not handle this type of nonlinear model? I'll need to double-check the capabilities of the Modelica language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know what's going on here. The key is to provide the specific values and define a parametric diagram with the Kirchhoff's Laws equations. That should get this model ready for solving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the diagram and the SysML-Modelica Transformation specification to figure out what else needs to be done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
Whew, okay, I think I know what to do here. I just need to discount the annual savings at the given cost of capital and then divide by the initial cost. Shouldn't be too tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote this question is just trying to trip us up. Gotta stay on our toes, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Twana
1 year ago
C) Nothing - it is ready as-is
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
1 year ago
B) Provide specific values. Nothing else is required, as Kirchhoff's I laws are automatically taken care of consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
1 year ago
D? Seriously? Modelica can definitely handle this kind of nonlinear model. These exam questions are getting a bit silly.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
1 year ago
A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
B) Provide specific values. Nothing else is required, as Kirchhoff's I laws are automatically taken care of consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 year ago
C can't be right, there's no way this model is ready as-is. We definitely need to do some more work to get it ready for solving.
upvoted 0 times
Norah
1 year ago
B) Provide specific values Nothing else is required, as Kirchhoff's I laws are automatically taken care of consistent with the above ibd
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
1 year ago
A can't be right, we definitely need to provide specific values and define equations for Kirchhoffs Laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 year ago
C) Nothing - it is ready as-is
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 year ago
A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamey
1 year ago
Interesting, I was leaning towards B. If Kirchhoff's laws are automatically taken care of, then we shouldn't need to do anything else, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
1 year ago
Hmm, that's an interesting point. I see where you're coming from, but I still think A) is the correct answer based on the requirements in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Provide specific values. Nothing else is required, as Kirchhoff's I laws are automatically taken care of consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say A is the correct answer. We need to provide specific values and define a parametric diagram with the necessary equations.
upvoted 0 times
Lanie
1 year ago
Definitely, providing specific values and equations is essential for the model to be solved correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 year ago
I think A is the best choice too. It's crucial to have all the necessary information for the model to be ready for solving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
That makes sense. It's important to include equations for Kirchhoff's Laws in the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 year ago
I agree, A is the correct answer. We need to provide specific values and define a parametric diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oneida
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Provide specific values. Also define a parametric diagram that includes equations for Kirchhoffs Laws consistent with the above ibd.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel