New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Okta Certified Professional Exam - Topic 4 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Okta's Okta Certified Professional exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 4
[All Okta Certified Professional Questions]

Is this a reason why SAML is more secure than Secure Web Authentication (SWA)?

Solution: SAML stores the user name and password in the assertion.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Celeste at May 07, 2022, 11:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Okta Certified Professional Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vivan
4 months ago
I thought SWA was pretty secure too, but SAML seems stronger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
4 months ago
Wait, does SAML really store passwords? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
Not sure about that, SWA has its own security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
5 months ago
Totally agree, SAML is way more secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
SAML uses assertions, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I recall that SAML is designed for single sign-on, which adds a layer of security, but I can't remember if the assertion part is a strong point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
5 months ago
I practiced a question about SAML and SWA, and I feel like SAML's use of tokens is what makes it more secure, not the storage of credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
I think SAML is considered more secure because it doesn't actually transmit passwords, but I might be mixing it up with other protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
5 months ago
I remember that SAML uses assertions, but I'm not sure if storing the username and password is the main reason for its security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the typical production environment setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify the options that provide the most direct and tangible benefits of running Coherence on WebLogic Servers. I think automatic failure detection and restart, as well as life cycle management through the console, are the two most obvious choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
5 months ago
I think the Alerting Timeout has to do with how long the system waits before disconnecting the interaction if the agent doesn't respond. Option D sounds like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel