Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Okta Certified Professional Exam - Topic 4 Question 25 Discussion

Is this a reason why SAML is more secure than Secure Web Authentication (SWA)?Solution: SAML stores the user name and password in the assertion.
B) No
A) Yes

Okta Certified Professional Exam - Topic 4 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Okta's Okta Certified Professional exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 4
[All Okta Certified Professional Questions]

Is this a reason why SAML is more secure than Secure Web Authentication (SWA)?

Solution: SAML stores the user name and password in the assertion.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vivan
9 months ago
I thought SWA was pretty secure too, but SAML seems stronger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
9 months ago
Wait, does SAML really store passwords? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
Not sure about that, SWA has its own security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
9 months ago
Totally agree, SAML is way more secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
9 months ago
SAML uses assertions, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
10 months ago
I recall that SAML is designed for single sign-on, which adds a layer of security, but I can't remember if the assertion part is a strong point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
10 months ago
I practiced a question about SAML and SWA, and I feel like SAML's use of tokens is what makes it more secure, not the storage of credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
10 months ago
I think SAML is considered more secure because it doesn't actually transmit passwords, but I might be mixing it up with other protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
10 months ago
I remember that SAML uses assertions, but I'm not sure if storing the username and password is the main reason for its security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
10 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the typical production environment setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify the options that provide the most direct and tangible benefits of running Coherence on WebLogic Servers. I think automatic failure detection and restart, as well as life cycle management through the console, are the two most obvious choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
10 months ago
I think the Alerting Timeout has to do with how long the system waits before disconnecting the interaction if the agent doesn't respond. Option D sounds like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel