Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NVIDIA Exam NCA-GENL Topic 7 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for NVIDIA's NCA-GENL exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 7
[All NCA-GENL Questions]

[Experimentation]

You have access to training data but no access to test dat

a. What evaluation method can you use to assess the performance of your AI model?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When test data is unavailable, cross-validation is the most effective method to assess an AI model's performance using only the training dataset. Cross-validation involves splitting the training data into multiple subsets (folds), training the model on some folds, and validating it on others, repeating this process to estimate generalization performance. NVIDIA's documentation on machine learning workflows, particularly in the NeMo framework for model evaluation, highlights k-fold cross-validation as a standard technique for robust performance assessment when a separate test set is not available. Option B (randomized controlled trial) is a clinical or experimental method, not typically used for model evaluation. Option C (average entropy approximation) is not a standard evaluation method. Option D (greedy decoding) is a generation strategy for LLMs, not an evaluation technique.


NVIDIA NeMo Documentation: https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nemo/user-guide/docs/en/stable/nlp/model_finetuning.html

Goodfellow, I., et al. (2016). 'Deep Learning.' MIT Press.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eveline
2 days ago
Randomized controlled trial? What is this, clinical research? Nah, this is machine learning, and cross-validation is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
9 days ago
Haha, greedy decoding? Really? That's for a different kind of problem. This is clearly a model evaluation question, and cross-validation is the way to tackle it.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
4 days ago
Cross-validation is the way to go for model evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonor
12 days ago
I think cross-validation is the best option in this scenario because it helps prevent overfitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
20 days ago
I don't think randomized controlled trial is suitable for assessing AI model performance without test data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
But what about randomized controlled trial? Could that be a valid option as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 months ago
I agree, cross-validation is the right choice. It's a robust way to assess your model's performance without needing to hold out a test set.
upvoted 0 times
Lourdes
2 hours ago
It helps in assessing performance without needing a separate test set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
24 days ago
Cross-validation is a good choice for evaluating the AI model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
Cross-validation is the way to go here. It's a classic technique for model evaluation when you don't have separate test data.
upvoted 0 times
Burma
8 days ago
It's important to choose the right evaluation method to ensure the accuracy of the AI model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
15 days ago
Cross-validation helps in estimating how well a model will generalize to new data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
25 days ago
I agree, cross-validation is a reliable method for assessing model performance without separate test data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonor
1 months ago
I agree with Novella, cross-validation is a good method when we only have access to training data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 months ago
I think we can use cross-validation to assess the performance of our AI model.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel