Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 1
[All NCS-Core Questions]

A consultant creates a four-node AHV cluster with two 1GbE (eth0, etc1) and two 10GbE (eth2, eth3) NICs per node. The 1GbE NICs will not be placed into service, but the customer wants the network to be preconfigured for their eventual use.

The consultant removes the 1GbE NIC from the default bond and creates a second bridge(br1), but is unable to add the 1GbE NIC using the below command:

manage_ovs --bridge_name br1 --interfaces 1g --bond_name br1-up update_uplinks

Which parameter is missing from this command?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Elouise at Nov 27, 2023, 04:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCS-Core Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lenna
2 months ago
I bet the consultant is regretting not going with wireless NICs. No cables, no problems!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
Ah, I see, the command needs to include the specific 1GbE interfaces. C is the answer, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Yesenia
6 days ago
Got it, thanks for the clarification. C) --interfaces eth0 it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
9 days ago
So, the correct answer is indeed C) --interfaces eth0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
15 days ago
Yes, you are correct. The command needs to specify the 1GbE interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
17 days ago
I think the missing parameter is C) --interfaces eth0.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
3 months ago
The command is missing the --interfaces parameter to specify the 1GbE interfaces. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
Michell
1 months ago
Yes, the --interfaces parameter is missing to add the 1GbE NIC. Option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
2 months ago
I agree, the command needs to specify the 1GbE interfaces. Option C is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
2 months ago
I think the missing parameter is --interfaces eth0. That's option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merri
3 months ago
Wait, shouldn't we also specify the bond mode or something? I'm not sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Zoila
1 months ago
User 4: Good idea. Let's see if that solves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 months ago
User 3: That makes sense. Let's give it a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
2 months ago
User 2: I think you're right. Let's try adding --bond_mode in the command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
2 months ago
User 1: Maybe we need to add the bond mode in the command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
User 2: Maybe the missing parameter is --bond_mode?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
User 1: I think we need to specify the bond mode in the command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
User 2: No, I believe it should be --require_link=false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
User 1: I think the missing parameter is --interfaces eth0.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss further to figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
Hmm, the command seems to be missing the --interfaces parameter. I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the missing parameter is --bond_duplex full.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
I think the missing parameter is --interfaces eth0.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel