A customer needs a 20-node cluster built. The consultant only has a 16-port flat network switch, and the customer is using VLAN tagging for the hosts and CVMs.
D is the only way to go. Anything else would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Gotta work with the resources you have, not the ones you wish you had.
Haha, I can't imagine trying to fit a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch. Option D is the clear winner. Might as well throw a hammer at the problem if you go with any other choice.
I'm going with D. Building a separate four-node cluster is the only logical choice here. Trying to force a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch is just asking for trouble.
Shawnta
3 months agoTequila
1 months agoArlene
1 months agoSean
2 months agoClare
2 months agoLewis
3 months agoJeannetta
3 months agoValentine
3 months agoBonita
3 months agoOwen
3 months agoMabelle
3 months agoHoa
3 months agoCherilyn
3 months agoSunshine
2 months agoRodney
2 months agoAmina
2 months agoKris
2 months agoBonita
3 months ago