Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All NCS-Core Questions]

A consultant is reviewing a customers Pre-delivery Questionnaire.

The customer wants to deploy their cluster with ESXi as the hypervisor with vSphere Distributed Switch. The customer will be using Cisco Nexus 9k as their switch choice In the kick-off call, it is confirmed that the customer has a business requirement to use LACP in their environment.

What should the consultant ensure that the customer configures on the port-channel interface before deployment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Venita
2 months ago
Wait, 'service unsupported-transceiver'? That's just silly. What does that even have to do with LACP configuration? D all the way, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Mira
20 days ago
Wait, 'service unsupported-transceiver'? That's just silly. What does that even have to do with LACP configuration? D all the way, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
21 days ago
D) no lacp suspend-individual
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
28 days ago
C) service unsupported-transceiver
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
29 days ago
B) no lacp graceful-convergence
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 months ago
A) show pore-channel
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
2 months ago
Haha, 'show pore-channel'? Really? I think the candidate who suggested that needs to go back to networking 101. Obviously, D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
28 days ago
Definitely not 'show pore-channel'. D is the way to go for ensuring LACP in the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
1 months ago
Yeah, D is the only logical choice here. The customer needs to configure 'no lacp suspend-individual' on the port-channel interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
1 months ago
I agree, 'show pore-channel' doesn't make sense. D is definitely the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracie
3 months ago
I'm not sure about option B, 'no lacp graceful-convergence'. Isn't that related to HSRP or VRRP, not LACP? I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, let's go with option D, 'no lacp suspend-individual'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
User 1: I think option B is not related to LACP, it's for HSRP or VRRP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moira
3 months ago
I also think that 'no lacp suspend-individual' is the correct option. It will help ensure a smooth deployment of the cluster with ESXi and vSphere Distributed Switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Configuring 'no lacp suspend-individual' ensures that the port-channel interface remains active even if one of the member ports fails.
upvoted 0 times
Ben
1 months ago
D: Yes, we should ensure 'no lacp suspend-individual' is configured on the port-channel interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
C: The customer needs to use LACP, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 months ago
B: Yes, they want to deploy with ESXi and vSphere Distributed Switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
A: Did you review the customer's Pre-delivery Questionnaire?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
3 months ago
I agree with Claribel. Configuring 'no lacp suspend-individual' is important for the customer to meet their business requirement of using LACP in their environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
4 months ago
I think the consultant should ensure that the customer configures 'no lacp suspend-individual' on the port-channel interface.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel