Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-NS Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Posted by Martha on May 12, 2026 at 12:58 PM

An administrator has created a VPC with the following subnets:

10.1.1.0/24

10.1.2.0/24

10.1.3.0/24

What action must be taken for these networks to be externally routable?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium NCP-NS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
SH
Shalon 2 days ago
I agree, C makes sense. It allows for proper address translation.
AS
Ashley 7 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. NAT is essential for external routing.
JO
Joesph 12 days ago
C makes sense. It covers the subnet range well.
PO
Pok 18 days ago
I’m confused. Why not just use NAT for all?
SH
Sherell 23 days ago
B is interesting, but I lean towards C. More reliable.
TI
Tiara 28 days ago
A seems too broad. We need specific routing.
TA
Tanesha 1 month ago
I feel like D could work too. NAT is important for security.
OM
Omer 1 month ago
I think it’s option C. NAT is essential for external routing.
IR
Irving 1 month ago
Surprised there's no mention of security implications!
JU
Judy 2 months ago
Wait, why would you use a No-NAT option here?
EL
Elvera 2 months ago
Actually, I disagree, D seems more appropriate.
ST
Stephaine 2 months ago
I think option C is the right choice!
ED
Edda 2 months ago
You need a NAT External Network for external routing.
VA
Val 2 months ago
Are we sure about those subnet masks? Seems off.
OM
Omer 2 months ago
Wait, why do we need a NAT for this?
AR
Arminda 3 months ago
No way, it’s definitely option A.
PE
Pedro 3 months ago
I think option C is the right choice!
CE
Celestina 3 months ago
You need a NAT External Network for external routing.
KA
Kami 3 months ago
I’m leaning towards the NAT option, but I’m confused about whether it should be /22 or /23. I wish I had reviewed that part more!
AV
Avery 3 months ago
I think we might need a No-NAT option since we're dealing with external routing, but I can't recall the exact ERP size we should use.
RO
Rory 4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to make subnets routable. I think it might be about the ERP size too.
MA
Matthew 5 months ago
I remember something about NAT and external networks, but I'm not sure if we need a No-NAT or NAT option here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel