New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All NCP-MCI Questions]

An administrator has two identical clusters managed by separate Prism Central instances. The guest VMs have pass-through GPUs. A scheduled maintenance is set for one of the clusters.

Which option would migrate VMs minimizing downtime?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Anglea
6 hours ago
Surprised that Cross-Cluster Live Migration is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 days ago
I think A) Run a Recovery Plan planned failover could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
11 days ago
Cross-Cluster Live Migration is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
16 days ago
Haha, D) Migrate Asynchronous Protection Domains? That's like trying to herd cats during a tornado!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
21 days ago
A) Recovery Plan planned failover might be a bit overkill for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
26 days ago
C) Nutanix Move migration plan could work, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 month ago
I feel like migrating Asynchronous Protection Domains might not be the best option here, but I can't recall the specifics on how it impacts downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the Nutanix Move migration plan. Does it really support live migration, or is it more for moving workloads between clusters?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 month ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the Recovery Plan planned failover is more about disaster recovery rather than minimizing downtime during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 months ago
Cross-Cluster Live Migration sounds like the safest bet to me. It's the most direct way to move the VMs with minimal disruption during the maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
Migrating Asynchronous Protection Domains seems risky to me. I'd want to avoid that if possible and go with a more straightforward migration method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Nutanix Move migration plan. It's designed specifically for this kind of scenario and should handle the GPU pass-through VMs properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 months ago
I think Cross-Cluster Live Migration could be the right choice since it minimizes downtime, but I'm not entirely sure how it handles pass-through GPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
B) Use Cross-Cluster Live Migration seems like the best option to minimize downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
2 months ago
B) Use Cross-Cluster Live Migration is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
D is not ideal for minimizing downtime. B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
3 months ago
C seems interesting, but not sure it’s the best for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a Recovery Plan planned failover be better? That way you can automate the whole process and ensure a smooth transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
3 months ago
I think Cross-Cluster Live Migration would be the best option to minimize downtime. It allows you to move VMs between clusters without interrupting service.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel