Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix NCP-MCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All NCP-MCI Questions]

A company is evaluating Nutanix DR to protect some business critical applications and tasked an administrator to find an optimal configuration providing highest resiliency and lowest RPO to the production environment.

The company's production environment is deployed on two physical sites with each hosting one AHV-based cluster.

What configuration will meet the company's requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tora at Jul 07, 2025, 05:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ashley
5 months ago
Definitely leaning towards C, Metro Availability is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
5 months ago
Surprised that A isn't the top pick, it seems solid too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
5 months ago
I think B might actually work better for lower RPO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
6 months ago
Not sure about D, seems a bit overcomplicated for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
6 months ago
Option C is the best choice for high resiliency!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
6 months ago
I think NearSync replication could work, but I remember it being less resilient than Metro. I should probably double-check the differences before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
6 months ago
I feel like deploying Prism Central on both sites is crucial for redundancy. But I can't recall if that was part of the Metro Availability setup or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think synchronous replication could be a good choice for high resiliency. Wasn't there a practice question about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of minimizing RPO and RTO during our study sessions. I think Metro Availability might be the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
7 months ago
This is a good opportunity to showcase my Nutanix knowledge. I'm pretty confident I can analyze the pros and cons of each option and recommend the optimal configuration to meet the company's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
7 months ago
I'm a little confused by the Metro AHV option. I'm not super familiar with that, so I'll need to do some research on how that works before deciding on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key requirements are highest resiliency and lowest RPO, so I'm thinking either the synchronous replication or Metro Availability options would be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the replication options like synchronous, NearSync, and Metro Availability. I'll need to review those details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
8 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Nutanix DR configuration question. I think I've got a good handle on the different options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
Haha, just throw a coin and pick one. This is like choosing between a Ferrari, a Porsche, and a Lamborghini - they're all great options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
10 months ago
Hmm, Option D caught my eye. Prism Central Disaster Recovery and Metro AHV could be a clever solution, but I'm not sure if it fully meets the 'highest resiliency' requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Glen
8 months ago
Option D could be a good choice for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diane
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. NearSync replication using Protection Domains sounds like a good balance between cost and recovery capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Dell
9 months ago
NearSync replication using Protection Domains does seem like a good fit for the company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
10 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like a cost-effective solution with good recovery capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
10 months ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. NearSync replication using Protection Domains offers a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option D could also work well with Prism Central Disaster Recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
10 months ago
I'm with Michael on this one. As long as it's not Option A, I think any of these choices will do the job.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. NearSync replication using Protection Domains sounds like a good fit for our setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
I agree, Option A seems risky. I think Option C would provide the highest resiliency and lowest RPO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
I agree with Dustin, Metro Availability using Protection Domains seems like the most resilient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
11 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel