MENU
A company is evaluating Nutanix DR to protect some business critical applications and tasked an administrator to find an optimal configuration providing highest resiliency and lowest RPO to the production environment.
The company's production environment is deployed on two physical sites with each hosting one AHV-based cluster.
What configuration will meet the company's requirements?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
AS
Ashley
9 months ago
Definitely leaning towards C, Metro Availability is key here.
BO
Boris
10 months ago
Surprised that A isn't the top pick, it seems solid too!
GI
Gilbert
10 months ago
I think B might actually work better for lower RPO.
DO
Dortha
10 months ago
Not sure about D, seems a bit overcomplicated for this setup.
ET
Ettie
10 months ago
Option C is the best choice for high resiliency!
EL
Elin
11 months ago
I think NearSync replication could work, but I remember it being less resilient than Metro. I should probably double-check the differences before answering.
GA
Galen
11 months ago
I feel like deploying Prism Central on both sites is crucial for redundancy. But I can't recall if that was part of the Metro Availability setup or not.
FL
Flo
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think synchronous replication could be a good choice for high resiliency. Wasn't there a practice question about that?
PA
Paola
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of minimizing RPO and RTO during our study sessions. I think Metro Availability might be the best option here.
FL
Florinda
11 months ago
This is a good opportunity to showcase my Nutanix knowledge. I'm pretty confident I can analyze the pros and cons of each option and recommend the optimal configuration to meet the company's needs.
DI
Dick
12 months ago
I'm a little confused by the Metro AHV option. I'm not super familiar with that, so I'll need to do some research on how that works before deciding on the best approach.
CH
Chantay
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key requirements are highest resiliency and lowest RPO, so I'm thinking either the synchronous replication or Metro Availability options would be the best fit.
LI
Lindsey
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the replication options like synchronous, NearSync, and Metro Availability. I'll need to review those details carefully.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Nutanix DR configuration question. I think I've got a good handle on the different options here.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
Haha, just throw a coin and pick one. This is like choosing between a Ferrari, a Porsche, and a Lamborghini - they're all great options!
SH
Sherell
1 year ago
Hmm, Option D caught my eye. Prism Central Disaster Recovery and Metro AHV could be a clever solution, but I'm not sure if it fully meets the 'highest resiliency' requirement.
GL
Glen
1 year ago
Option D could be a good choice for disaster recovery.
DI
Diane
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. NearSync replication using Protection Domains sounds like a good balance between cost and recovery capabilities.
DE
Dell
1 year ago
NearSync replication using Protection Domains does seem like a good fit for the company's requirements.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems like a cost-effective solution with good recovery capabilities.
DA
Danica
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. NearSync replication using Protection Domains offers a good balance.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
I'm not sure, I think option D could also work well with Prism Central Disaster Recovery.
GE
Genevieve
1 year ago
I'm with Michael on this one. As long as it's not Option A, I think any of these choices will do the job.
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. NearSync replication using Protection Domains sounds like a good fit for our setup.
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
I agree, Option A seems risky. I think Option C would provide the highest resiliency and lowest RPO.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
I agree with Dustin, Metro Availability using Protection Domains seems like the most resilient option.
DU
Dustin
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice.