New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix NCP-MCA Exam - Topic 10 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCA exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 10
[All NCP-MCA Questions]

An administrator had provided Linux VM console access to the OS Team. However, the team is unable to access one of the newly-created Linux VMs.

How can the administrator resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Clay at Jan 26, 2024, 01:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jody
3 months ago
A local user might not be the best solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
3 months ago
Wait, can they really just assign category access? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
3 months ago
Definitely agree with option C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
I think giving Prism Admin access is overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
Sounds like they need to create a role for the OS Team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
4 months ago
Assigning VMs to a category seems like a good idea, but I wonder if that would actually solve the access issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
4 months ago
I feel like creating a role for the OS Team sounds familiar from our practice questions, but I can't recall the exact steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
4 months ago
I think providing Prism Admin access could be too broad; we might want to limit their permissions instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 months ago
I remember we discussed creating local users, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for VM access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
5 months ago
This looks like a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of Linux VM management. I'd start by carefully reviewing the options and considering the most secure and scalable way to grant the OS team the access they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is the issue that the OS team can't access the VMs at all, or just that they can't access one specific VM? That could affect the best approach to resolving the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to set up the appropriate access controls for the OS team. Creating a role for their Active Directory group and adding the VMs to that role seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions the administrator providing console access, so I'm not sure if creating a local user or assigning category access is the right approach. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about managing user access to Linux VMs. I'd start by reviewing the options and thinking about the best way to grant the OS team the necessary permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. The group legal services are the only one that exceeds the typical de minimis value, so that's the answer I'm going with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully weigh the options and think through the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel