New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-EUC Exam - Topic 8 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 8
[All NCP-EUC Questions]

A company wants their Nutanix VDI environment to have these characteristics:

* 3000 non-persistent desktops

* 500 RDSH-based VMS

* 100 AppStacks

How many storage containers should an administrator create to satisfy these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Nutanix offers a solution that delivers virtual apps and desktops in one click. Nutanix supports both persistent and non-persistent VDI deployments, as well as RDSH-based VMs and AppStacks.

Storage containers are logical units that group vDisks and apply storage policies such as replication factor, encryption, compression, deduplication and erasure coding3.Nutanix recommends using compression and deduplication to reduce storage usage and avoid duplicate data4.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
An
3 months ago
C with deduplication could save space, but is it enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
I agree with B, it's more efficient that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
3 months ago
Wait, can one container really handle all that? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
German
4 months ago
Definitely need separate containers for each type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
4 months ago
I lean towards option A since it seems logical to separate the non-persistent desktops from the RDSH VMs and AppStacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
4 months ago
I feel like we should definitely consider deduplication, but I can't recall if that means we need two containers or just one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we grouped similar workloads, so maybe option B could be right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I think we might need separate containers for each type of workload, but I'm not sure if they can be combined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
I think the simplest approach would be to just use a single container for all the workloads. That way, we don't have to worry about managing multiple containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
The question mentions deduplication, so I'm wondering if we could get away with just 2 containers and leverage deduplication to save space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
5 months ago
I'm not sure if we need separate containers for the non-persistent desktops and RDSH-based VMs. Maybe we can combine those into a single container and have a separate one for the AppStacks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. We have 3000 non-persistent desktops, 500 RDSH-based VMs, and 100 AppStacks. I'm thinking we'll need at least 3 containers, one for each workload type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the storage requirements for each workload type carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Can organizations really transfer both responsibility and accountability to their CSPs? I'm not sure about that. I'll need to review the material on compliance ownership again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think I'll try stopping and starting the QlikView Webserver service first. That might reset the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel