Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCP-EUC Topic 7 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 7
[All NCP-EUC Questions]

How should the storage containers be configured to follow Nutanix storage best practices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in is a tool that enables Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Delivery Controllers (also called Brokers) to create and manage Citrix-provisioned VMs in a Nutanix AHV infrastructure environment.The plug-in is based on the Citrix-defined plug-in framework2.

To install the Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in, you need to meet some prerequisites, such as:

The Delivery Controller version must be 7.15 LTSR CU3 or later.

The Delivery Controller must be able to communicate with Prism Element (PE) using HTTPS port 9440.

The Delivery Controller must have PowerShell 5.1 or later installed.

The user running the installer must have administrator privileges on the Delivery Controller2.

https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/solutions/details?targetId=RA-2020-Citrix-Virtual-Apps-and-Desktops-AMD-MCS-Windows-10:RA-2020-Citrix-Virtual-Apps-and-Desktops-AMD-MCS-Windows-10


by Robt at Jun 02, 2024, 05:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-EUC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hortencia
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go, folks. Unless, of course, you want to end up in a world of storage mayhem. Although, who knows, maybe option D is just a secret Nutanix initiation rite?
upvoted 0 times
Tracie
1 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to follow best practices for Nutanix storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
1 months ago
Yeah, option D seems a bit confusing. Stick with option B for Nutanix best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, separate containers with different settings seem like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
2 months ago
I agree, enabling different features based on VM type can help optimize storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
2 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice for storage containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Separate containers for different types of VMS make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
3 months ago
I'm going with B. It's the only one that makes sense to me. Although, I wonder if the Nutanix engineers were drinking their own Kool-Aid when they came up with these options.
upvoted 0 times
Ora
2 months ago
Definitely. It's important to follow best practices for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 months ago
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. It seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
2 months ago
I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
3 months ago
D? Really? Putting compression on the non-persistent VMs and deduplication on the persistent ones? That's just backward!
upvoted 0 times
Kenia
2 months ago
B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 months ago
C) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Erasure Coding for both VMS
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
3 months ago
A) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Deduplication for both VMS
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Domingo
3 months ago
I prefer using a single container with Erasure Coding for both VMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Erasure coding might be overkill, but I like the simplicity of a single container. Hmm, decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Lorita
2 months ago
Cristy: Hmm, maybe I'll reconsider my choice and go with C as well. Thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
2 months ago
User 3: I agree with Stanton. C seems like a good choice for Nutanix storage best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
User 2: I see your point, but I prefer C. Simplicity with a single container and erasure coding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
2 months ago
User 1: I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
3 months ago
I agree, enabling Compression for non-persistent VMS makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
3 months ago
Option B seems to be the way to go. Separating the containers and applying the right compression and deduplication settings based on the VM types is a best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
3 months ago
I think we should use separate containers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel