MENU
How should the storage containers be configured to follow Nutanix storage best practices?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium NCP-EUC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To install the Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in, you need to meet some prerequisites, such as:
The Delivery Controller version must be 7.15 LTSR CU3 or later.
The Delivery Controller must be able to communicate with Prism Element (PE) using HTTPS port 9440.
The Delivery Controller must have PowerShell 5.1 or later installed.
The user running the installer must have administrator privileges on the Delivery Controller2.
41 comments · newest first
RE
Renea
10 months ago
Compression and Deduplication are a must for persistent VMs!
BL
Blossom
11 months ago
Definitely prefer separate containers for better management.
KE
Kenia
11 months ago
Surprised that people still use a single container!
LO
Long
11 months ago
I disagree, A seems simpler.
NG
Ngoc
11 months ago
I think option B is the way to go!
ET
Ettie
11 months ago
I recall that enabling compression for non-persistent VMs is important, but I can't remember if it was in option B or D.
JO
Johnetta
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether to use a single container or separate ones. I feel like we had a similar question on our last quiz.
LO
Louvenia
12 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it mentions enabling compression and deduplication for persistent VMs, which we practiced in class.
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
I remember we discussed using separate containers for different types of VMs, but I'm not sure if it's always necessary.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% sure about the best practices for Nutanix storage, but I'll give it my best shot and try to reason through the options.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Nutanix storage optimization is something I've studied a lot, so I think I can eliminate the incorrect answers and select the right configuration.
CH
Charlena
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be understanding when to use compression, deduplication, and erasure coding. I'll carefully consider each option and try to apply the best practices I've learned.
KA
Katheryn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the difference between persistent and non-persistent VMs. I'll need to review that before I can confidently answer this question.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about Nutanix storage best practices. I think I've got a good handle on this topic, so I'll give it a shot.
JA
Jackie
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm feeling pretty confident. I'd start by ensuring the order number is unique in the OMS, and then using that as the external ID in Salesforce. That should do the trick.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
I remember learning about this in class, but I'm having trouble recalling the exact steps. I'll have to read through the options closely.
HO
Hortencia
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go, folks. Unless, of course, you want to end up in a world of storage mayhem. Although, who knows, maybe option D is just a secret Nutanix initiation rite?
TR
Tracie
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to follow best practices for Nutanix storage.
JO
Johna
1 year ago
Yeah, option D seems a bit confusing. Stick with option B for Nutanix best practices.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, separate containers with different settings seem like a good idea.
LY
Lyndia
1 year ago
I agree, enabling different features based on VM type can help optimize storage efficiency.
VA
Valentine
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice for storage containers.
NO
Norah
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice. Separate containers for different types of VMS make sense.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
I'm going with B. It's the only one that makes sense to me. Although, I wonder if the Nutanix engineers were drinking their own Kool-Aid when they came up with these options.
OR
Ora
1 year ago
Definitely. It's important to follow best practices for optimal performance.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. It seems like the most logical choice.
JU
Julie
1 year ago
I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
D? Really? Putting compression on the non-persistent VMs and deduplication on the persistent ones? That's just backward!
KE
Kenia
1 year ago
B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS
TY
Ty
1 year ago
C) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Erasure Coding for both VMS
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS
CH
Chandra
1 year ago
A) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Deduplication for both VMS
DO
Domingo
2 years ago
I prefer using a single container with Erasure Coding for both VMS.
TY
Ty
2 years ago
I'm torn between B and C. Erasure coding might be overkill, but I like the simplicity of a single container. Hmm, decisions, decisions...
LO
Lorita
1 year ago
Cristy: Hmm, maybe I'll reconsider my choice and go with C as well. Thanks for the input!
ST
Stanton
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Stanton. C seems like a good choice for Nutanix storage best practices.
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
User 2: I see your point, but I prefer C. Simplicity with a single container and erasure coding.
AN
Anastacia
1 year ago
User 1: I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.
TY
Ty
2 years ago
I agree, enabling Compression for non-persistent VMS makes sense.
JA
Jaime
2 years ago
Option B seems to be the way to go. Separating the containers and applying the right compression and deduplication settings based on the VM types is a best practice.
NE
Nelida
2 years ago
I think we should use separate containers.