MENU
A company is using Citrix for virtual desktops on Nutanix with AHV. The studio has 10,000 users who will be connecting to this infrastructure and have deployed a dedicated Files cluster for holding the user home shares.
Since this is a dedicated cluster with dual Intel 6242 28 GHz 16 Core processors and 192GB of RAM, what should be done for the FSVM and
CVM configuration to allow for optimal performance?
34 comments · newest first
TE
Telma
10 months ago
Wait, are we really sure this setup can handle 10,000 users?
ED
Eden
11 months ago
Definitely agree with the FSVM RAM increase, it’ll help with performance.
LI
Lisha
11 months ago
96GB for FSVM RAM sounds like overkill to me.
VE
Veda
11 months ago
Not sure about that, 12 vCPUs should be enough for CVM.
CH
Chaya
11 months ago
I think increasing the CVM vCPUs to 16 is a solid move.
AN
Annabelle
11 months ago
I feel like I read that the FSVM needs more resources due to the number of users, but I can't remember if 96GB is too much or just right.
MA
Malissa
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the CVM settings. I thought leaving the vCPUs at 12 was standard, but I can't recall the exact impact of increasing the FSVM.
DU
Dulce
12 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to optimize RAM for the FSVM. Increasing it to 96GB sounds familiar.
TO
Tomas
1 year ago
I remember something about balancing resources between the CVM and FSVM, but I'm not sure if increasing the vCPUs is the best approach here.
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on the details provided, I think increasing the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSVM vCPUs to 12 would be the best approach to ensure optimal performance. The RAM increases in the other options seem a bit excessive for this scenario.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. With 10,000 users, we'll need to make sure the FSVM and CVM have enough resources to handle the load. Increasing the vCPUs and RAM seems like a good strategy, but I'm not sure which specific configuration would be optimal. I'll need to review the options and think it through.
VE
Verdell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question provides a lot of details about the infrastructure, but I'm not entirely sure what the best approach would be for the FSVM and CVM configurations. I'll need to think this through carefully.
ST
Stefan
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about optimizing the FSVM and CVM configurations for a Citrix virtual desktop environment on Nutanix. I think I have a good handle on the key considerations here.
JA
Janella
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Salesforce's authentication methods. I'll have to think this one through carefully.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the details about roll-up summaries and object references to make sure I understand the limitations.
GE
Geraldo
1 year ago
Wait, we're talking about Nutanix, right? I thought this was a trick question and the answer was just 'buy more Nutanix nodes'.
RO
Rosann
1 year ago
C: Maybe we should leave the CVM vCPUs at 12 and increase the FSVM vCPUs to 8.
OC
Octavio
1 year ago
B: No, we should increase the CVM RAM to 64GB and the FSVM RAM to 96GB.
MA
Marget
1 year ago
A: I think we need to increase the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSVM vCPUs to 12.
JU
Julio
1 year ago
You know, if this were a real-life scenario, I'd just ask the Nutanix support team. They'd probably have the perfect config for my eyes-wide-shut.
RI
Rikki
1 year ago
That sounds like a solid plan for optimal performance.
LA
Lasandra
1 year ago
I think increasing the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSW vCPUs to 12 would be a good option.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
Yeah, Nutanix support team is always helpful with configurations.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
C looks good to me. Keeping the CVM vCPUs at 12 and boosting the FSVM to 8 vCPUs should give us a nice balance of compute power.
TH
Thersa
1 year ago
User1: Definitely, that configuration should help optimize performance for the virtual desktops.
SH
Shalon
1 year ago
User2: Agreed, keeping the CVM vCPUs at 12 and increasing the FSVM vCPUs to 8 sounds like a solid plan.
RE
Reuben
1 year ago
User1: I think C is the way to go. It's a good balance of resources.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards D. Increasing the FSVM RAM makes sense, but I don't think we need to beef up the CVM that much. Let's keep it lean and mean!
LA
Lashanda
1 year ago
Hmm, I think B is the way to go. Dedicating more RAM to the FSVM will really help with file operations and storage performance for those 10,000 users.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, increasing the CVM RAM to 64GB and the FSVM RAM to 96GB seems like the best option for optimal performance.
LE
Leonida
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, dedicating more RAM to the FSVM will definitely improve performance.
KA
Kanisha
2 years ago
I think increasing the CVM RAM to 64GB and the FSVM RAM to 96GB would be the best option for optimal performance.
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe we should leave the CVM vCPUs at 12 and increase the FSVM vCPUs to 8 instead.
AM
Amber
2 years ago
I think we should increase the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSW vCPUs to 12 for optimal performance.