Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix NCP-DB Exam - Topic 6 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-DB exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 6
[All NCP-DB Questions]

An online retail application requires data to be synchronized between multiple SQL Server databases. This provides clearer reporting from

multiple databases at the Same time for consistency at the end of each business day.

What is the best way to fulfill this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Nutanix Era enables you to clone your source databases and refresh the database clones by using snapshots or transaction logs1.For an online retail application that requires data to be synchronized between multiple SQL Server databases, having all the databases present in the same Database Virtual Machine (DBVM) and registering them in Era with Multiple Databases as a Group with one Time Machine would be the most efficient way to fulfill this requirement1.This approach allows for clearer reporting from multiple databases at the same time for consistency at the end of each business day1.


by Phillip at Sep 17, 2024, 04:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-DB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawnna
4 months ago
Wait, can we really sync multiple databases like that? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
5 months ago
A is too basic, we need better synchronization!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
5 months ago
Not sure about D, what if there's a single point of failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
I agree, D is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
5 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether having one Time Machine is sufficient for all databases. I thought we needed a more robust setup for synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
6 months ago
I feel like option D might be the best choice since it aligns with what we learned about high availability and consistency across databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
6 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because we practiced scenarios with multiple databases as a group, but I can't recall the exact benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having all databases in the same Availability Group for synchronization, but I'm not sure if that's the only factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem similar, but I'm not confident I fully understand the differences between them. I'll make my best guess, but I may need to come back to this question if I have time at the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to have all the databases in the same DBVM and register them in Era. Option B looks like the best choice since it allows for multiple databases to be managed as a group with a single Time Machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to understand which one best fulfills the requirement of synchronizing data between multiple SQL Server databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about database synchronization. I think I know the right approach, but I'll carefully read through the options to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to re-enable the interfaces, so I'll focus on the options that directly address that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers had fun coming up with these options. They really want to see if we know our stuff!
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
1 year ago
D) Have all the databases in the same Availability Group and register databases in Era.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
B) Have all the databases present in the same DBVM and register databases in Era with Multiple Databases as a Group with one Time Machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
A) Have all the databases present in the same DBVM and register databases in Era.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
2 years ago
Wow, this question is really testing our database management knowledge. I'm going to have to think hard about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Herschel
1 year ago
C) Have all the databases present in the same DBVM and register databases in Era with One Database with One Time Machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
B) Have all the databases present in the same DBVM and register databases in Era with Multiple Databases as a Group with one Time Machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
A) Have all the databases present in the same DBVM and register databases in Era.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zack
2 years ago
B is the way to go! Grouping the databases together with one Time Machine is a great way to manage the synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but having all the databases present in the same DBVM and registering databases in Era with Multiple Databases as a Group with one Time Machine could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
2 years ago
C seems like a good option too. One database with one Time Machine could work for keeping the data consistent across the databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Having the databases in the same Availability Group and registering them in Era makes the most sense for synchronizing data across multiple databases.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
1 year ago
I agree with the user comment, option D with all the databases in the same Availability Group seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 years ago
Yes, it's important to have a reliable method like this for clearer reporting across multiple databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 years ago
Having all the databases in the same group definitely simplifies the synchronization process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
2 years ago
I agree, having them in the same Availability Group would ensure consistency in reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B with Multiple Databases as a Group with one Time Machine is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
2 years ago
I think the best option is D. It makes sense to have all the databases in the same Availability Group for data synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 years ago
I think option A is the best way to fulfill the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
2 years ago
I agree with Jenise. Having all the databases in the same Availability Group will ensure data synchronization and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
2 years ago
I think the best way is to have all the databases in the same Availability Group and register databases in Era.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel