MENU
An administrator has been tasked with deploying a new production NC2 cluster on AWS and is studying the deployment..
AWS supports EC2 bare-metal instances in regions with at least how many partitions?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium NCP-CI-AWS Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
AWS supports EC2 bare-metal instances in regions with at least 3 partitions. Partitions in AWS provide high availability and fault tolerance by distributing instances across different hardware to minimize the impact of hardware failures.
30 comments · newest first
SH
Sharmaine
10 months ago
Really? I had no idea it was that low!
WE
Werner
10 months ago
Totally agree, it's 3 for sure!
WI
Willow
10 months ago
AWS needs at least 3 partitions for bare-metal instances.
WA
Wai
10 months ago
Wait, I thought it was 5?
LE
Lettie
10 months ago
Nope, definitely 3. I've checked!
CE
Celestina
11 months ago
I feel like I read that it was 6 partitions, but I can't recall the exact details. This is tricky!
GA
Galen
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought it was just 1 partition. I need to double-check my notes on this.
TU
Tuyet
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I believe it was 5 partitions for EC2 bare-metal instances.
YO
Youlanda
11 months ago
I think I remember something about bare-metal instances needing at least 3 partitions, but I'm not entirely sure.
GE
Gerardo
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm going to read through the question again carefully and try to break it down step-by-step. Hopefully that will help me arrive at the right answer.
PA
Paris
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not very familiar with the specifics of AWS partitions and bare-metal instances. I'll have to review my notes and see if I can figure this out.
CE
Celestina
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the minimum number of partitions required for AWS to support EC2 bare-metal instances in a region. I'm going to go with C - 5 partitions.
LA
Larue
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
JA
Janae
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is B - 3 partitions.
KA
Kassandra
1 year ago
Haha, bare-metal on the cloud, what a concept! I'm going to go with D, just to keep things interesting.
AR
Armanda
1 year ago
Bare-metal on AWS? That's like putting a tank engine in a Prius. I'll go with B, just to keep things simple.
KR
Krystina
1 year ago
I agree, bare-metal instances on AWS seem like overkill.
FA
Farrah
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer too. It's always good to keep things simple.
GE
German
1 year ago
I agree, bare-metal instances on AWS seem like overkill. B is probably the best choice.
NO
Norah
1 year ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. Bare-metal instances on AWS... who would've thought? I'm going to guess C, just to be different.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's B, not C.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
I think it's actually D, not C.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
I remember reading that it's actually A) 1
CA
Carmelina
1 year ago
I'm going with D. Six partitions sounds about right for the kind of infrastructure needed to support bare-metal instances on a cloud platform like AWS.
TA
Tabetha
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) 5
DE
Detra
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Three partitions seem like a reasonable requirement for AWS to support bare-metal instances.
BR
Broderick
1 year ago
I think you're right, B does seem like a reasonable requirement for AWS to have in place for supporting bare-metal instances.
JA
Jaleesa
1 year ago
I agree, B sounds like the correct answer. Three partitions should be sufficient for AWS to support EC2 bare-metal instances.
AD
Adaline
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's D) 6
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 3