Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix NCA-v6.10 Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCA-v6.10 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All NCA-v6.10 Questions]

How many copies of the metadata are maintained within a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Juan Gabriel Sabogal Morales at May 30, 2025, 03:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCA-v6.10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bernadine
4 months ago
I thought it was 2, this is new info for me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 5?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
4 months ago
Totally agree, redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
4 months ago
Definitely 3, that's standard practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
5 months ago
It's 3 copies for RF3 clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards 7 because I recall something about additional overhead in redundancy, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
5 months ago
I feel like redundancy factors can be tricky. I want to say it’s 3 copies, but what if it’s more to ensure data safety?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think it was about how many copies are kept in total. Could it be 5?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
5 months ago
I think a redundancy factor of 3 means we keep three copies, but I'm not entirely sure if that includes the original.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know redundancy is important, but I'm not sure how it applies to the metadata specifically. I'll have to review my notes and try to figure out the relationship between redundancy and metadata in a cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
6 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Redundancy Factor 3 means there are 3 copies of the data, right? So the answer must be 3 copies of the metadata as well. I'm confident that B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know redundancy is important, but I'm not familiar with the specifics of how it works in a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about redundancy in a cluster. I think the answer is B, 3 copies of the metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
10 months ago
I'm just gonna go with B. Three copies. It's like the three little pigs, but with metadata instead of houses. 'Not by the hair on my chinny-chin-chin!'
upvoted 0 times
Candida
9 months ago
Yeah, it's like having backup plans for your backup plans. Can never be too careful with metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
9 months ago
I think B is the right answer too. Three copies seems like a good redundancy factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Princess
10 months ago
D. Seven copies of the metadata? That's a lot of redundancy! Are they trying to make sure the data survives the apocalypse or something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
10 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this... Redundancy Factor 3, so I guess the answer is 3. No need to overthink it, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
8 months ago
No problem, happy to help!
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
9 months ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
10 months ago
Actually, the correct answer is 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 months ago
I think the answer is 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
10 months ago
I'm going with C. Five copies of the metadata seems about right for a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster. Gotta have that redundancy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
9 months ago
I'll go with A. Two copies of the metadata might be sufficient for a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
10 months ago
I'm going with C. Five copies of the metadata seems about right for a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
10 months ago
I think it's B. Three copies of the metadata should be enough for a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharee
10 months ago
I think it's B) 3 because with a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster, there should be 3 copies of the metadata to ensure data reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
10 months ago
B) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
10 months ago
Well, if it's a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster, the answer has to be B. Three copies of the metadata, easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Ashlee
9 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
That's right, three copies of the metadata are maintained in a Redundancy Factor 3 cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
10 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel