New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCA Exam - Topic 6 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCA exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 6
[All NCA Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

After an abrupt power outage, an administrator receives a number of alerts indicating disks are failed. Prism Element shows a large number of disks offline as seen in the diagram. This single block, four node cluster is configured FT1 with an RF2 container holding all user data.

What number of drive failures on different domains (node, block, or rack) could this configuration have tolerated prior to seeing data unavailability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kimberlie
2 months ago
Nope, it’s actually 4 failures, check your facts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
Definitely 2, RF2 means redundancy across nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
3 months ago
Surprised it can only handle 2! Seems low for a 4 node cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
3 months ago
I thought it was 3 failures, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
3 months ago
This setup can tolerate 2 drive failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards 1 failure being the max, but I need to double-check how that relates to the nodes in this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
4 months ago
I feel like RF2 means it can handle a certain number of failures, but I can't recall if it's 3 or 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to calculate tolerances based on node configurations. Could it be 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
I remember something about fault tolerance, but I'm not sure how many failures RF2 can handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
4 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the answer is C. The configuration can tolerate 3 drive failures across different domains before seeing data unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. What exactly is "FT1" and "RF2"? I'll need to make sure I understand those concepts before I can answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
5 months ago
Okay, the question is asking about the number of drive failures this configuration could tolerate. I think I need to consider the replication factor and the cluster setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think about the redundancy and fault tolerance of the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel