MENU
How many copies of metadata are written for a Replication Factor of 2 (RF2)?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium NCA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
KI
Kimberlie
10 months ago
I thought it was 4, but I guess not!
AS
Ashley
11 months ago
Nope, it's 2 for sure.
BR
Brynn
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 3?
ER
Ernestine
11 months ago
Totally agree, RF2 means 2 copies!
RI
Rickie
11 months ago
It's definitely 2 copies for RF2.
RE
Remona
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought RF2 meant 2 copies, but what if it’s something else? I might be overthinking it.
LE
Leota
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like RF2 definitely means 2 copies, so A seems right to me.
CA
Candra
12 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about replication factors being linked to the number of copies. Could it be B?
JU
Justine
1 year ago
I think for RF2, it means there are 2 copies of everything, so maybe the answer is A?
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is 3 copies of metadata for RF2. The metadata needs to be replicated just like the data, so there should be one more copy than the Replication Factor.
RE
Rebbecca
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The Replication Factor determines how many copies of the data are stored, but the metadata is also replicated. So for RF2, there should be 2 copies of the metadata as well. I'll go with option A.
LE
Lezlie
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't the Replication Factor the number of copies of the data, not the metadata? I'm not sure about this one.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the answer is 2 copies of metadata for a Replication Factor of 2.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to find the setting that will help the customer control the agent state from non-adherence to the more severe "severely non-adherent" condition.
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between enabling auditing and enabling change tracking. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.
TW
Twana
2 years ago
The question is a bit confusing, but I think it's just asking about the Replication Factor itself. So, A) 2.
TA
Tayna
2 years ago
I also believe it's two copies. A) 2 makes the most sense considering the term Replication Factor.
HA
Haydee
2 years ago
No, the question seems straightforward to me. RF2 implies two copies.
LA
Laine
2 years ago
But what if it's asking about additional copies? Then maybe it's C) 3?
LE
Lezlie
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. So, the answer should be A) 2, right?
HA
Haydee
2 years ago
I think the Replication Factor of 2 means two copies of metadata.