Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia BL0-100 Exam - Topic 4 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's BL0-100 exam

Question #: 51
Topic #: 4

[All BL0-100 Questions]

Which of the following is a valid NFV attack?

CPoor NFV implementation

AHijack attack on hypervisor

DHypervisor resources leakage

BDDoS attack on the SDN switches

CPoor NFV implementation

DHypervisor resources leakage

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, C

by Noah at Jul 12, 2024, 08:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BL0-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kip

9 months ago

DDoS on SDN switches is a valid concern too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

9 months ago

Wait, is poor implementation really considered an attack?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

10 months ago

Hypervisor resource leakage is a big deal, for sure!

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

10 months ago

I think hijack attacks on hypervisors are more common.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phung

10 months ago

Poor NFV implementation can definitely lead to attacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

10 months ago

I feel like DDoS attacks on SDN switches are more about network disruption, not specifically NFV attacks. I think I’ll lean towards hypervisor resources leakage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about poor NFV implementation. Is that really considered an attack, or more of a vulnerability?

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

11 months ago

I remember practicing a question about resource leakage before, and it seems like that could be a valid attack too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

11 months ago

I think a hijack attack on the hypervisor could definitely be a valid NFV attack, but I'm not entirely sure if it’s the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to take another look at the differences between hypervisor attacks, DDoS, and NFV implementation issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

11 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about these types of attacks in class. I think the key is to focus on the vulnerabilities in the NFV architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamekia

11 months ago

Okay, let's see. I know NFV stands for Network Functions Virtualization, so the attacks must be related to that. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on NFV attacks before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

11 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident the correct answer is "Poor NFV implementation".

upvoted 0 times

...

Pansy

11 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The options mention a few different AWS services, but the one that seems to match the description the best is Server Load Balancer. That service is designed to handle varying traffic levels without needing manual intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

11 months ago

I've got this! Option A is the way to go. It directly compares the hostname in the HTTP request to the specified 'www.example.com'. That's exactly what the question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

1 year ago

Ah, the age-old question: which NFV attack is the most valid? I'm going to go with the classic 'poor implementation' - it's like the IT version of the 'user error' excuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

1 year ago

Hypervisor resources leakage? What is this, a game of virtual hide-and-seek? I'm going with the poor NFV implementation - at least that's a real-world problem, not some made-up techno mumbo-jumbo.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wai

1 year ago

Ooh, poor NFV implementation, huh? Sounds like someone's been spending too much time in the virtual world and not enough in the real one. I'm sticking with option B - can't go wrong with a good old DDoS attack!

upvoted 0 times

Lonna

1 year ago

DDoS attack on the SDN switches can cause a lot of damage quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

1 year ago

Hijack attack on hypervisor sounds pretty serious too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

1 year ago

I think poor NFV implementation can definitely leave systems vulnerable.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Annabelle

1 year ago

DDoS on SDN switches? Now that's just asking for trouble. I bet the right answer is something more subtle, like that hypervisor resource leakage thing.

upvoted 0 times

An

1 year ago

Yeah, poor NFV implementation could also be a valid attack vector that is often overlooked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

1 year ago

I think you're right, a subtle attack like hypervisor resource leakage would be harder to detect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

1 year ago

I agree, DDoS attacks are too obvious and can be easily detected.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Aleshia

1 year ago

Poor NFV implementation? Sounds like a lazy way to fail the exam. I'm going with the hypervisor hijack attack - that's the real deal!

upvoted 0 times

Jina

1 year ago

DDoS attack on the SDN switches is another valid NFV attack to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

1 year ago

Hypervisor resources leakage could also cause serious issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

1 year ago

I think the hypervisor hijack attack is more sophisticated and dangerous.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

1 year ago

I agree, poor NFV implementation is just asking for trouble.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Candida

1 year ago

I believe poor NFV implementation could also be a valid attack, as it can create vulnerabilities in the system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

1 year ago

I agree with Trinidad, hijacking the hypervisor could compromise the entire NFV infrastructure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

1 year ago

I think a valid NFV attack could be a hijack attack on the hypervisor.

upvoted 0 times

...