MENU
Which of the following is a valid NFV attack?
Suggested Answer: C, C
Get Premium BL0-100 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
KI
Kip
11 months ago
DDoS on SDN switches is a valid concern too!
CH
Charlene
11 months ago
Wait, is poor implementation really considered an attack?
TI
Tijuana
11 months ago
Hypervisor resource leakage is a big deal, for sure!
FA
Fausto
11 months ago
I think hijack attacks on hypervisors are more common.
PH
Phung
12 months ago
Poor NFV implementation can definitely lead to attacks.
LO
Lorrine
12 months ago
I feel like DDoS attacks on SDN switches are more about network disruption, not specifically NFV attacks. I think I’ll lean towards hypervisor resources leakage.
LA
Larue
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about poor NFV implementation. Is that really considered an attack, or more of a vulnerability?
CU
Curtis
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about resource leakage before, and it seems like that could be a valid attack too.
AD
Adelle
1 year ago
I think a hijack attack on the hypervisor could definitely be a valid NFV attack, but I'm not entirely sure if it’s the best answer here.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to take another look at the differences between hypervisor attacks, DDoS, and NFV implementation issues.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about these types of attacks in class. I think the key is to focus on the vulnerabilities in the NFV architecture.
TA
Tamekia
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know NFV stands for Network Functions Virtualization, so the attacks must be related to that. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem relevant.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on NFV attacks before answering.
VA
Van
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident the correct answer is "Poor NFV implementation".
PA
Pansy
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The options mention a few different AWS services, but the one that seems to match the description the best is Server Load Balancer. That service is designed to handle varying traffic levels without needing manual intervention.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
I've got this! Option A is the way to go. It directly compares the hostname in the HTTP request to the specified 'www.example.com'. That's exactly what the question is asking for.
AD
Adell
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question: which NFV attack is the most valid? I'm going to go with the classic 'poor implementation' - it's like the IT version of the 'user error' excuse.
JU
Jules
1 year ago
Hypervisor resources leakage? What is this, a game of virtual hide-and-seek? I'm going with the poor NFV implementation - at least that's a real-world problem, not some made-up techno mumbo-jumbo.
WA
Wai
1 year ago
Ooh, poor NFV implementation, huh? Sounds like someone's been spending too much time in the virtual world and not enough in the real one. I'm sticking with option B - can't go wrong with a good old DDoS attack!
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
DDoS attack on the SDN switches can cause a lot of damage quickly.
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
Hijack attack on hypervisor sounds pretty serious too.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I think poor NFV implementation can definitely leave systems vulnerable.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
DDoS on SDN switches? Now that's just asking for trouble. I bet the right answer is something more subtle, like that hypervisor resource leakage thing.
AN
An
1 year ago
Yeah, poor NFV implementation could also be a valid attack vector that is often overlooked.
PA
Pa
1 year ago
I think you're right, a subtle attack like hypervisor resource leakage would be harder to detect.
AV
Avery
1 year ago
I agree, DDoS attacks are too obvious and can be easily detected.
AL
Aleshia
2 years ago
Poor NFV implementation? Sounds like a lazy way to fail the exam. I'm going with the hypervisor hijack attack - that's the real deal!
JI
Jina
1 year ago
DDoS attack on the SDN switches is another valid NFV attack to consider.
JE
Jerrod
1 year ago
Hypervisor resources leakage could also cause serious issues.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
I think the hypervisor hijack attack is more sophisticated and dangerous.
VE
Verlene
1 year ago
I agree, poor NFV implementation is just asking for trouble.
CA
Candida
2 years ago
I believe poor NFV implementation could also be a valid attack, as it can create vulnerabilities in the system.
MI
Micaela
2 years ago
I agree with Trinidad, hijacking the hypervisor could compromise the entire NFV infrastructure.
TR
Trinidad
2 years ago
I think a valid NFV attack could be a hijack attack on the hypervisor.