New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-D01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-D01 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All 4A0-D01 Questions]

Which of the following statements about IP-VRFs in Nokia's SR Linux is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Multiple servers connected to the same subnet typically reside within the same Layer 2 domain or MAC-VRF. IP-VRFs operate at Layer 3 and segment routing and forwarding by separate routing tables, so multiple servers on the same subnet are not a function of IP-VRF.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jacquelyne
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Distinct route tables seem odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
2 months ago
B is spot on, forwarding is based on destination IP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
3 months ago
I agree, A is true for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
3 months ago
I think D sounds off, can multiple servers really share a subnet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
3 months ago
IP-VRF is definitely a Layer 3 instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
3 months ago
I feel like B is correct too, but I’m a bit confused about how forwarding works in VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the distinct route table for each IP-VRF was emphasized, so C should be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
4 months ago
I’m not sure about D; I think multiple servers can share a subnet, but does that apply to IP-VRFs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
I remember that IP-VRFs are definitely Layer 3 instances, so A seems true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
4 months ago
This is a tricky one. I know IP-VRFs are used for virtual routing and forwarding, but the details are a bit fuzzy. I think I'll eliminate the option that seems the most different from the other characteristics I'm familiar with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
4 months ago
Okay, let me see. I remember that IP-VRFs allow for segmentation and isolation of network traffic. So the statement about multiple servers being connected to the same subnet doesn't sound right to me. I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know IP-VRFs have to do with routing and forwarding, but I'm not entirely clear on the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I know IP-VRFs are Layer 3 network instances, and the router maintains separate route tables for each instance. The key is to identify the statement that doesn't fit with those characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
This question is making my head spin like a top! But I'm pretty confident the correct answer is A. An IP-VRF is definitely a Layer 3 network instance. Or is it a Layer 2? Ugh, I need a nap.
upvoted 0 times
Ines
7 months ago
The router does maintain a distinct route table for each IP-VRF instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
7 months ago
Yes, packets in an IP-VRF are forwarded based on the destination IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
7 months ago
I think you're right, an IP-VRF is definitely a Layer 3 network instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clay
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this. Can someone explain why multiple servers cannot be connected to the same subnet in an IP-VRF?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
8 months ago
I agree with Jackie. Each IP-VRF has its own routing table, so multiple servers cannot be connected to the same subnet within an IP-VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
8 months ago
I'm going to have to go with B. Packets in an IP-VRF are forwarded based on the unicorn's horn, not the destination IP address. Everyone knows that!
upvoted 0 times
Audry
7 months ago
Ena: Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
7 months ago
User 2: I think you might be mistaken. The router maintains a distinct route table for each IP-VRF instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
7 months ago
User 1: Actually, that's not correct. Packets in an IP-VRF are forwarded based on the destination IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittani
8 months ago
Aha! I've got it. The answer is C. The router does not maintain a distinct route table for each IP-VRF instance. That's just crazy talk!
upvoted 0 times
Matt
7 months ago
User 2: No, I believe the answer is D. Multiple servers can be connected to the same subnet in an IP-VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
8 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A. An IP-VRF is a Layer 3 network instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
Hmm, I think A is the false statement. An IP-VRF is a Layer 2 network instance, not Layer 3. Or is it the other way around? I'm getting my layers mixed up!
upvoted 0 times
Zona
7 months ago
Lucina: Oh, I see. I got my layers mixed up. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
7 months ago
User 3: Packets in an IP-VRF are forwarded based on the destination IP address, so B is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
8 months ago
User 2: Actually, an IP-VRF is a Layer 3 network instance, so A is not the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
8 months ago
User 1: I think A is the false statement. An IP-VRF is a Layer 2 network instance, not Layer 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jackie
8 months ago
I think the false statement is D) Multiple servers can be connected to the same subnet in an IP-VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. Multiple servers can be connected to the same subnet in an IP-VRF. That just makes sense, right?
upvoted 0 times
Janae
8 months ago
Apolonia: Hmm, let me double check. You might be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
8 months ago
User 2: Are you sure? I think it's A. An IP-VRF is a Layer 3 network instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
8 months ago
User 1: Actually, the correct answer is C. The router maintains a distinct route table for each IP-VRF instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel