MENU
Click on the exhibit.
The route table on router R2 shows the system address of router R5 but it does not show any of the interfaces from the non-OSPF area.
What may be causing this?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
KA
Katina
11 months ago
I heard R1's config can mess things up too, so A might be right.
MA
Mayra
11 months ago
Wait, how can R5 not have an export policy? That seems odd!
DI
Dino
11 months ago
Nah, I disagree, it could be D instead.
VE
Verdell
11 months ago
I think it's definitely C, R5 needs that export policy.
IR
Irma
12 months ago
Looks like 'asbr' is the issue here.
DA
Darrin
12 months ago
I feel like import policies are usually more about controlling incoming routes, so I'm not convinced that option D is the right answer here.
ZA
Zana
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C because if R5 doesn't have the right export policy, that could definitely explain why the interfaces aren't showing up.
MI
Mitsue
1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question where the missing 'asbr' caused routing issues. Maybe that's what's happening with router R1?
RO
Robt
1 year ago
I remember something about OSPF areas and how they interact, but I'm not sure if it's the export policy that's the issue here.
RE
Rebeca
1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it. This is likely an issue with the ASBR (Autonomous System Border Router) configuration on R1. I'll double-check that first.
VI
Vivan
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. The options mention something about 'asbr' and export/import policies. I'll need to refresh my knowledge on OSPF area types and routing policies.
GO
Goldie
1 year ago
Hmm, the lack of interface information for the non-OSPF area on R2's route table is concerning. I'll need to think through the possible reasons for that.
SH
Shizue
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF routing question. I'll need to carefully review the route table and network topology to identify the potential issue.
JO
Joana
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the Speed Voucher Entry as well. It seems like the most streamlined option for high-volume, straightforward voucher entries.
CH
Charlie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The customer environment is described as "very dynamic", so I'm wondering if the PowerShell Library for HPE OneView might be a better fit to allow them to script environment modifications.
JO
Joye
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. Requirement. The question says we need to create a unique planned purchase order for every new demand requirement, so the Requirement coverage code seems like the best option to achieve that.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
Hey, at least it's not a question about EIGRP this time! *laughs* But seriously, C sounds like the way to go here.
SA
Sarah
1 year ago
We should definitely check Router R5's configuration to confirm.
LU
Lucia
1 year ago
Yeah, it makes sense that Router R5 may not have an export policy for those prefixes.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
I agree, C does seem like the most likely reason for the issue.
RU
Rueben
1 year ago
Wait, wait, wait... did someone say 'export policy'? That's music to my ears! I'm going with C on this one, no doubt.
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
Yeah, it seems like that could be the cause of the problem.
TH
Therese
1 year ago
I agree, Router R5 probably needs to have an export policy for those prefixes.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I think the issue might be with the export policy on Router R5.
JU
Juliana
2 years ago
Haha, classic OSPF configuration problem. I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Router R5 needs to get its act together and start advertising those routes!
FR
Frank
1 year ago
True, that could also be a factor. Both routers need to have the right policies in place.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
Maybe Router R1 also needs to have an import policy added to it for those routes.
RE
Reuben
1 year ago
Yeah, it seems like that's the issue. Router R5 needs to start advertising those prefixes.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
I think you're right, Router R5 definitely needs to set up an export policy.
GE
Georgiana
2 years ago
But could it also be that Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes?
DE
Dean
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Maybe 'asbr' is missing from router R1.
GR
Gretchen
2 years ago
I think the issue might be with router R1's configuration.
MA
Markus
2 years ago
You know, I was just thinking the same thing! I bet C is the correct answer here. Gotta make sure those prefixes are being exported properly.
AH
Ahmad
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have everything set up correctly for routing to work smoothly.
MA
Marya
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, C seems like the right choice. Router R5 probably needs an export policy for those prefixes.
GE
Geoffrey
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the issue might be that router R5 doesn't have an export policy set up. It's probably not advertising those prefixes from the non-OSPF area.
JA
Jacquline
1 year ago
D) Router R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.
TW
Twanna
1 year ago
I agree, router R5 needs to have an export policy set up.
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
C) Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes.
AL
Alease
2 years ago
A) 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
ST
Stephen
2 years ago
Maybe we should suggest adding an import policy to router R1 as well.
FI
Filiberto
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
I think the issue might be with router R1's configuration.