New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 1 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

The route table on router R2 shows the system address of router R5 but it does not show any of the interfaces from the non-OSPF area.

What may be causing this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Silvana at May 10, 2024, 01:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katina
3 months ago
I heard R1's config can mess things up too, so A might be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
3 months ago
Wait, how can R5 not have an export policy? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
Nah, I disagree, it could be D instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
4 months ago
I think it's definitely C, R5 needs that export policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
4 months ago
Looks like 'asbr' is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
4 months ago
I feel like import policies are usually more about controlling incoming routes, so I'm not convinced that option D is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C because if R5 doesn't have the right export policy, that could definitely explain why the interfaces aren't showing up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
4 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where the missing 'asbr' caused routing issues. Maybe that's what's happening with router R1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
5 months ago
I remember something about OSPF areas and how they interact, but I'm not sure if it's the export policy that's the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. This is likely an issue with the ASBR (Autonomous System Border Router) configuration on R1. I'll double-check that first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. The options mention something about 'asbr' and export/import policies. I'll need to refresh my knowledge on OSPF area types and routing policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
Hmm, the lack of interface information for the non-OSPF area on R2's route table is concerning. I'll need to think through the possible reasons for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF routing question. I'll need to carefully review the route table and network topology to identify the potential issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Speed Voucher Entry as well. It seems like the most streamlined option for high-volume, straightforward voucher entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The customer environment is described as "very dynamic", so I'm wondering if the PowerShell Library for HPE OneView might be a better fit to allow them to script environment modifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
5 months ago
I think the answer is D. Requirement. The question says we need to create a unique planned purchase order for every new demand requirement, so the Requirement coverage code seems like the best option to achieve that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
9 months ago
Hey, at least it's not a question about EIGRP this time! *laughs* But seriously, C sounds like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
8 months ago
We should definitely check Router R5's configuration to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
8 months ago
Yeah, it makes sense that Router R5 may not have an export policy for those prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
9 months ago
I agree, C does seem like the most likely reason for the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rueben
10 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... did someone say 'export policy'? That's music to my ears! I'm going with C on this one, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
8 months ago
Yeah, it seems like that could be the cause of the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
8 months ago
I agree, Router R5 probably needs to have an export policy for those prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
9 months ago
I think the issue might be with the export policy on Router R5.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juliana
10 months ago
Haha, classic OSPF configuration problem. I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Router R5 needs to get its act together and start advertising those routes!
upvoted 0 times
Frank
8 months ago
True, that could also be a factor. Both routers need to have the right policies in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
8 months ago
Maybe Router R1 also needs to have an import policy added to it for those routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
8 months ago
Yeah, it seems like that's the issue. Router R5 needs to start advertising those prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
9 months ago
I think you're right, Router R5 definitely needs to set up an export policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiana
10 months ago
But could it also be that Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
10 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Maybe 'asbr' is missing from router R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
10 months ago
I think the issue might be with router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
You know, I was just thinking the same thing! I bet C is the correct answer here. Gotta make sure those prefixes are being exported properly.
upvoted 0 times
Ahmad
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to have everything set up correctly for routing to work smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, C seems like the right choice. Router R5 probably needs an export policy for those prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the issue might be that router R5 doesn't have an export policy set up. It's probably not advertising those prefixes from the non-OSPF area.
upvoted 0 times
Jacquline
9 months ago
D) Router R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
9 months ago
I agree, router R5 needs to have an export policy set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
C) Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
10 months ago
A) 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
11 months ago
Maybe we should suggest adding an import policy to router R1 as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
11 months ago
Yeah, I agree. 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
11 months ago
I think the issue might be with router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel