Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Posted by Lai on Mar 17, 2024 at 01:12 AM

Which of the following about VPRNs is TRUE?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
SH
Shawna 11 months ago
D sounds weird, can’t believe only one customer per PE.
VA
Val 11 months ago
Totally agree with C, it's all about the PEs!
CA
Casey 11 months ago
Wait, are you saying B is true? That seems off!
JI
Jillian 11 months ago
I think C is true, just need PE configs for new VPRNs.
VA
Val 12 months ago
A is definitely false, customers can use different protocols.
MI
Micheal 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D being false because I think multiple customers can connect at the same PE in a VPRN setup.
BE
Berry 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether customers in the same VPRN need to be on the same subnet. I feel like that could be a requirement, but I can’t recall clearly.
AN
Anika 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like option C might be correct since it’s usually just the PEs that need configuration for VPRNs.
CA
Carmelina 1 year ago
I think I remember that customers don’t have to use the same routing protocol as the provider, but I’m not entirely sure.
DE
Dexter 1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C - the service provider only needs to configure the PEs to add new VPRNs, without any changes required on the customer side.
LA
Lacey 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know VPRNs allow service providers to offer private network services to multiple customers over a shared infrastructure. The question is asking about specific requirements, so I'll need to carefully consider each option.
MI
Mickie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know VPRNs have to do with virtual private networks, but the details about routing protocols and subnets are a bit fuzzy for me.
DO
Domingo 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I think the key is understanding how VPRNs work and the requirements for customers to be part of the same VPRN.
GE
Gerald 1 year ago
B. SMTP AUTH makes the most sense to me. It's a common authentication method that doesn't rely on client certs.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this where BGP was the correct choice, but I can't recall what the second function was.
YV
Yvette 1 year ago
This question feels similar to some practice problems we did on variable overhead variances. I think if the actual costs are lower than the budgeted, it's favorable, but I'm not 100% certain.
JA
Jame 1 year ago
Hmm, so for each VPRN, only one customer allowed? Sounds like a case of 'virtual private, real lonely.'
DE
Deonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jame
C) Service providers only need to perform configurations on the PEs to add additional VPRNs.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jame
B) Customers belonging to the same VPRN service must use the same subnet.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jame
A) Customers must use the same routing protocol as the service provider.
SU
Susana 1 year ago
I'm going with C. Providers should be able to add VPRNs without needing to touch the customer equipment. Who wants more work, am I right?
CO
Cory 1 year ago
D has to be the right answer. Having multiple customers on the same PE for a VPRN would defeat the purpose of isolation.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cory
I see your point. It's important to prioritize isolation in VPRNs.
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cory
That's true, but having multiple customers on the same PE could still pose a security risk.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cory
But what about option C? It seems like service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
PE
Pearlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cory
I think you're right, D does make sense for ensuring isolation.
PE
Peter 2 years ago
I'm not sure about the subnet requirement in option B. Isn't the whole point of VPRNs to provide isolated routing domains?
BR
Brittney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Peter
User 2: That makes sense. So, the correct answer must be C, where service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
BA
Barbra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Peter
User 1: Option B is incorrect. VPRNs are meant to provide isolated routing domains, so customers do not have to use the same subnet.
WI
Willis 2 years ago
But C makes sense because service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
AM
Ammie 2 years ago
Option C seems the most realistic. Configuring VPRNs on the PEs is the key task for service providers, not the customers.
AL
Alaine 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
WI
Willis 2 years ago
I think the answer is C.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel