Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Nokia Discussions
Exam 4A0-C04 Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion
Nokia Exam 4A0-C04 Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion
Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]
Which of the following about VPRNs is TRUE?
A
Customers must use the same routing protocol as the service provider.
B
Customers belonging to the same VPRN service must use the same subnet.
C
Service providers only need to perform configurations on the PEs to add additional VPRNs.
D
For each VPRN, only one customer can be connected at each PE.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
C
by
Lai
at
Mar 17, 2024, 01:12 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Jame
2 months ago
Hmm, so for each VPRN, only one customer allowed? Sounds like a case of 'virtual private, real lonely.'
upvoted
0
times
Deonna
1 months ago
C) Service providers only need to perform configurations on the PEs to add additional VPRNs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Janey
1 months ago
B) Customers belonging to the same VPRN service must use the same subnet.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
A) Customers must use the same routing protocol as the service provider.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Susana
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Providers should be able to add VPRNs without needing to touch the customer equipment. Who wants more work, am I right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Cory
2 months ago
D has to be the right answer. Having multiple customers on the same PE for a VPRN would defeat the purpose of isolation.
upvoted
0
times
Justine
22 days ago
I see your point. It's important to prioritize isolation in VPRNs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kimbery
29 days ago
That's true, but having multiple customers on the same PE could still pose a security risk.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cecil
1 months ago
But what about option C? It seems like service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Pearlie
1 months ago
I think you're right, D does make sense for ensuring isolation.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Peter
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the subnet requirement in option B. Isn't the whole point of VPRNs to provide isolated routing domains?
upvoted
0
times
Brittney
1 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. So, the correct answer must be C, where service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Barbra
2 months ago
User 1: Option B is incorrect. VPRNs are meant to provide isolated routing domains, so customers do not have to use the same subnet.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Willis
2 months ago
But C makes sense because service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ammie
2 months ago
Option C seems the most realistic. Configuring VPRNs on the PEs is the key task for service providers, not the customers.
upvoted
0
times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted
0
times
...
Willis
2 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Jame
2 months agoDeonna
1 months agoJaney
1 months agoKattie
2 months agoSusana
2 months agoCory
2 months agoJustine
22 days agoKimbery
29 days agoCecil
1 months agoPearlie
1 months agoPeter
2 months agoBrittney
1 months agoBarbra
2 months agoWillis
2 months agoAmmie
2 months agoAlaine
2 months agoWillis
2 months ago