Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]

Which of the following about VPRNs is TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lai at Mar 17, 2024, 01:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawna
5 months ago
D sounds weird, can’t believe only one customer per PE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
Totally agree with C, it's all about the PEs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
5 months ago
Wait, are you saying B is true? That seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
5 months ago
I think C is true, just need PE configs for new VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
6 months ago
A is definitely false, customers can use different protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D being false because I think multiple customers can connect at the same PE in a VPRN setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether customers in the same VPRN need to be on the same subnet. I feel like that could be a requirement, but I can’t recall clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like option C might be correct since it’s usually just the PEs that need configuration for VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
6 months ago
I think I remember that customers don’t have to use the same routing protocol as the provider, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
6 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C - the service provider only needs to configure the PEs to add new VPRNs, without any changes required on the customer side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know VPRNs allow service providers to offer private network services to multiple customers over a shared infrastructure. The question is asking about specific requirements, so I'll need to carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know VPRNs have to do with virtual private networks, but the details about routing protocols and subnets are a bit fuzzy for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I think the key is understanding how VPRNs work and the requirements for customers to be part of the same VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
7 months ago
B. SMTP AUTH makes the most sense to me. It's a common authentication method that doesn't rely on client certs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
7 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where BGP was the correct choice, but I can't recall what the second function was.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
7 months ago
This question feels similar to some practice problems we did on variable overhead variances. I think if the actual costs are lower than the budgeted, it's favorable, but I'm not 100% certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
12 months ago
Hmm, so for each VPRN, only one customer allowed? Sounds like a case of 'virtual private, real lonely.'
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
11 months ago
C) Service providers only need to perform configurations on the PEs to add additional VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
11 months ago
B) Customers belonging to the same VPRN service must use the same subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
12 months ago
A) Customers must use the same routing protocol as the service provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susana
12 months ago
I'm going with C. Providers should be able to add VPRNs without needing to touch the customer equipment. Who wants more work, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
12 months ago
D has to be the right answer. Having multiple customers on the same PE for a VPRN would defeat the purpose of isolation.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
11 months ago
I see your point. It's important to prioritize isolation in VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
11 months ago
That's true, but having multiple customers on the same PE could still pose a security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
11 months ago
But what about option C? It seems like service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
11 months ago
I think you're right, D does make sense for ensuring isolation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Peter
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the subnet requirement in option B. Isn't the whole point of VPRNs to provide isolated routing domains?
upvoted 0 times
Brittney
11 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. So, the correct answer must be C, where service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
12 months ago
User 1: Option B is incorrect. VPRNs are meant to provide isolated routing domains, so customers do not have to use the same subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willis
1 year ago
But C makes sense because service providers only need to configure the PEs for additional VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 year ago
Option C seems the most realistic. Configuring VPRNs on the PEs is the key task for service providers, not the customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel