Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Click the exhibit.Routers RR1 and RR2 are route reflectors with the same Cluster-ID. How does router RA treat the updates for prefix 192.168.1.0/27 received from routers RR1 and RR2?
C) Router RA flags both updates as invalid.
A) Router RA prefers the update received from router RR1.
B) Router RA prefers the update received from router RR2.
D) Router RA accepts both updates and flags them as used.

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]

Click the exhibit.

Routers RR1 and RR2 are route reflectors with the same Cluster-ID. How does router RA treat the updates for prefix 192.168.1.0/27 received from routers RR1 and RR2?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Alesia at Dec 09, 2023, 02:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Buffy
6 months ago
Both updates being flagged as used? Sounds odd to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
6 months ago
Pretty sure RA would prefer one over the other, not both.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
7 months ago
Wait, how can RA accept both? Isn’t that confusing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
7 months ago
I think it’s definitely D. Makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
7 months ago
Router RA accepts both updates and flags them as used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m not completely confident. I remember something about flagging updates as used, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
8 months ago
I feel like I read that if both updates are from the same cluster, RA might prefer one over the other, but I can't recall which one it was.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
8 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where it mentioned that updates from the same cluster-ID are treated differently. Could it be that RA accepts both?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
8 months ago
I remember something about route reflectors, but I'm not sure how RA handles updates from both RR1 and RR2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
8 months ago
This is a good test of my BGP knowledge. I'll methodically go through the options and apply what I know about route reflection to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
8 months ago
I'm a little confused on how the router RA should handle these updates. I'll need to re-read the question and the exhibit carefully to make sure I understand the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the route reflectors have the same cluster-ID, router RA should treat the updates as equal and accept both of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the BGP decision process and how it handles updates from route reflectors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky BGP question. I'll need to carefully review the route reflection concepts and the rules for handling updates from route reflectors with the same cluster-ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it asking about the risk of a small p-value, or something else? I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think the Select Items for Cycle Count program might be the right choice, but I'll have to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
8 months ago
I think the answer is True. I remember discussing how service inventories are meant for composing and recomposing services in our study group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
I think it's IPv6 Source Guard, but I might be mixing it up with something else we went over.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel