New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

What is the minimum number of Route Distinguishers required to implement an overlapping VPRN involving 5 different customers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mira at Sep 13, 2024, 07:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dolores
3 months ago
7 seems excessive, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
3 months ago
Definitely not 1, that's for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
3 months ago
Wait, is it really 5? That seems high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
4 months ago
I think 3 would be enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
4 months ago
You need at least 5 Route Distinguishers for 5 customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I believe the minimum is 1, but I feel like there could be a catch with overlapping routes that I might be missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about this. I thought overlapping VPRNs needed more Route Distinguishers, but I can't recall the exact number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the answer might be 3. It seems like we could group some customers together.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
I think we need at least one Route Distinguisher per customer, so maybe it's 5? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
I think the key here is that it's an overlapping VPRN. In that case, the minimum number of Route Distinguishers required is 3, since the customers can share some of the Route Distinguishers. I'll double-check my understanding, but I'm pretty sure 3 is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't the minimum number of Route Distinguishers always equal to the number of customers in an overlapping VPRN? Or is there some other factor I'm missing here? I'll have to review the VPRN concepts again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. For an overlapping VPRN with 5 customers, the minimum number of Route Distinguishers needed is 5. Each customer needs a unique Route Distinguisher to keep their traffic separate. I'm confident this is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I know Route Distinguishers are used to differentiate VPRNs, but I'm not sure of the exact formula for calculating the minimum number required. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
5 months ago
I think this question is asking about the minimum number of Route Distinguishers needed for an overlapping VPRN with 5 customers. I'll need to review my notes on VPRN configuration to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The last option about a customer being a supplier seems like the odd one out compared to the other more fundamental supply chain principles described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
9 months ago
Hold on, let me consult my crystal ball... Ah yes, the answer is 3 Route Distinguishers. Either that or the ghost of networking past is trying to tell me something. Either way, I'm feeling confident about this one!
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
8 months ago
That's correct, 3 is the minimum number required for the overlapping VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
9 months ago
I agree, it makes sense to have 3 for 5 different customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
9 months ago
I think the answer is 3 Route Distinguishers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalind
10 months ago
Route Distinguishers? I thought we were talking about how many roads a man must walk down before you can call him a man. Wait, wrong exam. Back to the networking stuff, 3 Route Distinguishers, got it!
upvoted 0 times
Janella
8 months ago
C) 5
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
8 months ago
B) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
8 months ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
10 months ago
Okay, 3 Route Distinguishers, got it. This should be an easy point on the exam. Now, if only I could remember how to configure those pesky Route Targets without googling the command...
upvoted 0 times
Anisha
8 months ago
D) 7
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
9 months ago
C) 5
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
B) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
10 months ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Ah, I see! The minimum number of Route Distinguishers is 3 to handle the overlapping VPRNs. Makes sense, though I wonder if the exam designer has a sense of humor and will throw in a trick question with 10 Route Distinguishers just to trip us up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
That makes sense, so it would be 3 Route Distinguishers for 5 different customers. I agree with you, Elza.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
11 months ago
I thought the answer would be 5, since each customer needs a unique Route Distinguisher. But I guess I overlooked the idea of overlapping VPRNs. Hmm, need to review that concept again.
upvoted 0 times
Leana
9 months ago
I see, so it's not necessary to have a unique Route Distinguisher for each customer in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
10 months ago
B) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
10 months ago
Yeah, you only need one Route Distinguisher for overlapping VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
10 months ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elza
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) 3 because we need one Route Distinguisher for each overlapping VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) 1 because we only need one Route Distinguisher per customer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel