New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 12 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 12
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

In the diagram below, SAP 1 is put into the blocking state as a result of the spanning tree protocol. What will occur in the VPLS instance if SAP 2 goes down and SAP 1 transitions to the forwarding state? Select the most accurate statement.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Isaac
3 months ago
Option D sounds too extreme for just one SAP going down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, seems more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
3 months ago
Wait, does that mean traffic could get misrouted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
4 months ago
Totally agree, stale info will be used for a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
4 months ago
I think option B is the most likely outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense since it mentions stale information, but I'm not completely confident about the flushing part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
I feel like an LDP control message is involved, but I can't recall if it flushes the entire FDB or just specific MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
4 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we discussed FDB aging. I think stale information might be used for a bit before it gets updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
5 months ago
I remember studying how the spanning tree protocol works, but I'm not entirely sure what happens when SAP 1 transitions to forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
Okay, I'm feeling more confident now. I believe the correct answer is option D, as an LDP control message will be sent to flush the entire FDB in the VPLS instance when SAP 1 transitions to the forwarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
I think I have a strategy for this. I'll start by reviewing the spanning tree protocol and how it impacts the forwarding behavior in a VPLS instance. Then I'll consider the implications of SAP 2 going down and SAP 1 transitioning to the forwarding state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology used in this question. VPLS, SAPs, and FDB tables - I'll need to make sure I understand these concepts before I can confidently select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key information here is that SAP 1 is in the blocking state due to the spanning tree protocol. I'll need to think through how that might impact the VPLS instance if SAP 2 goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'll need to carefully analyze the diagram and the options to determine the most accurate statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
Wait, do I need to do anything else besides just adding the alt text? I want to make sure I'm not missing any other steps here. I better review the instructions one more time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
Security management approval seems like a key step. We'll need their buy-in on the prioritization process to make sure it aligns with the organization's security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
9 months ago
I'm torn between options C and D, but I think D is the better choice. Flushing the entire FDB in the VPLS instance is the safest and most comprehensive way to handle this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Sabina
8 months ago
Agreed, option D seems like the most reliable choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
8 months ago
Exactly, it ensures that there are no stale entries causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
8 months ago
That makes sense, it's important to have a clean slate in such situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
8 months ago
SAP 1 transitioning to the forwarding state will trigger the flushing of the entire FDB in the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
10 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the network admin frantically hitting the 'Flush FDB' button after SAP 2 goes down. 'Time to hit the reset button on this whole thing!'
upvoted 0 times
Jean
8 months ago
User 3: The network admin must be really stressed out when something like that happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It makes sense to flush the entire FDB in that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
9 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
10 months ago
Option C doesn't quite make sense to me. Why would only the MAC addresses associated with the PE where the failure occurred be flushed? That seems too limited in scope for the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
8 months ago
Yeah, option D seems like the best choice for maintaining network stability in the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
8 months ago
I agree, option C does seem a bit limited. Flushing the entire FDB would ensure that all devices have up-to-date information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
9 months ago
I think option D makes more sense. Flushing the entire FDB in the VPLS instance seems like a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical about option B. Relying on stale information doesn't sound like a reliable solution, especially in a VPLS instance. The FDB needs to be properly updated to ensure proper forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
Floyd
9 months ago
Zona: That sounds like a more reliable solution for maintaining proper forwarding in a VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
9 months ago
User 2: I think option D makes more sense, flushing the entire FDB for a fresh start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, relying on stale information doesn't seem like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
10 months ago
Option D seems the most accurate. If SAP 2 goes down and SAP 1 transitions to forwarding, an LDP control message will be sent to all devices in the VPLS instance, resulting in a full FDB flush. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
8 months ago
Option D is definitely the most accurate choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
9 months ago
It's important for all devices participating in the VPLS instance to receive the message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
9 months ago
That means the entire FDB in the VPLS instance will be cleared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
9 months ago
SAP 1 transitioning to forwarding will trigger an LDP control message to flush the FDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
11 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel