Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-C02 Topic 12 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 12
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

In the diagram below, SAP 1 is put into the blocking state as a result of the spanning tree protocol. What will occur in the VPLS instance if SAP 2 goes down and SAP 1 transitions to the forwarding state? Select the most accurate statement.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jenise
1 months ago
I'm torn between options C and D, but I think D is the better choice. Flushing the entire FDB in the VPLS instance is the safest and most comprehensive way to handle this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Junita
8 days ago
SAP 1 transitioning to the forwarding state will trigger the flushing of the entire FDB in the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
1 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the network admin frantically hitting the 'Flush FDB' button after SAP 2 goes down. 'Time to hit the reset button on this whole thing!'
upvoted 0 times
Jean
4 days ago
User 3: The network admin must be really stressed out when something like that happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It makes sense to flush the entire FDB in that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
21 days ago
User 1: I think option D is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
2 months ago
Option C doesn't quite make sense to me. Why would only the MAC addresses associated with the PE where the failure occurred be flushed? That seems too limited in scope for the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
5 days ago
Yeah, option D seems like the best choice for maintaining network stability in the VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
8 days ago
I agree, option C does seem a bit limited. Flushing the entire FDB would ensure that all devices have up-to-date information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
23 days ago
I think option D makes more sense. Flushing the entire FDB in the VPLS instance seems like a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardo
2 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical about option B. Relying on stale information doesn't sound like a reliable solution, especially in a VPLS instance. The FDB needs to be properly updated to ensure proper forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
Floyd
16 days ago
Zona: That sounds like a more reliable solution for maintaining proper forwarding in a VPLS instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
17 days ago
User 2: I think option D makes more sense, flushing the entire FDB for a fresh start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
19 days ago
User 1: I agree, relying on stale information doesn't seem like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
2 months ago
Option D seems the most accurate. If SAP 2 goes down and SAP 1 transitions to forwarding, an LDP control message will be sent to all devices in the VPLS instance, resulting in a full FDB flush. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
7 days ago
Option D is definitely the most accurate choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
1 months ago
It's important for all devices participating in the VPLS instance to receive the message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
1 months ago
That means the entire FDB in the VPLS instance will be cleared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 months ago
SAP 1 transitioning to forwarding will trigger an LDP control message to flush the FDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
3 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel