Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-C02 Topic 12 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 12
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kanisha
1 months ago
Wait, did someone say 'management VPLS'? I thought we were talking about a 'management VPLC' (very particular lunch choices)!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
1 months ago
D) Hmm, I don't know about that. The output might not give us all the details, but there has to be some clue as to what's going on here.
upvoted 0 times
Alesia
4 days ago
B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
22 days ago
A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chu
1 months ago
B) Come on, that's just silly. The question clearly states that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are user VPLSs, so they have to be configured as such.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
2 months ago
C) That's the most likely reason. If VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, it could definitely lead to unexpected behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Arlene
28 days ago
C) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
1 months ago
B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
1 months ago
A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
2 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Option C does make sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 months ago
A) Definitely not the case. The question clearly states that VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections, so it has to be configured as a management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
Abel
28 days ago
D) VPLS 100 must be configured as a management VPLS since it was created for redundant spoke-SDP connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 months ago
C) It's possible that there is a problem with the configuration that is not evident from the output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
2 months ago
B) Maybe VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as VPLS 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
2 months ago
A) The issue might be that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not configured correctly as user VPLSs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elza
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
3 months ago
I think the most likely reason is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel