MENU
Click on the exhibit below.
Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
JO
Joaquin
11 months ago
No way to tell from the output? That seems off.
ET
Ethan
12 months ago
I doubt it's option C; they should be using the same spoke-SDPs.
AL
Alyce
12 months ago
Wait, are VPLS 10 and 20 really not user VPLS? That sounds odd.
PA
Patria
1 year ago
I think it's definitely option A. Makes the most sense.
MA
Margo
1 year ago
VPLS 100 needs to be properly configured as a management VPLS.
DO
Dorothy
1 year ago
I feel like option D could be a trick; sometimes the output doesn't give enough info to pinpoint the problem.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the spoke-SDPs were mismatched, so option C seems plausible, but I need to double-check.
DO
Dolores
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if VPLS 10 and 20 aren't set up as user VPLS, that could definitely cause issues.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
I remember something about management VPLS needing to be properly configured, so option A might be the right choice.
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the concepts before answering.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about SHA-1 in my cryptography class. I believe the answer is 160 bits, so I'll select option D.
WA
Wayne
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. The tool description seems to match Kismet, which is a wireless network discovery tool that can be used to crack encryption keys.
CO
Coletta
1 year ago
I think trade credit is the most common for small firms, but I'm not 100% sure if it provides the largest amount.
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
I'm almost certain it's not the line group, but I keep second-guessing myself between the hunt pilot and the route group.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
Wait, did someone say 'management VPLS'? I thought we were talking about a 'management VPLC' (very particular lunch choices)!
TU
Tu
1 year ago
D) Hmm, I don't know about that. The output might not give us all the details, but there has to be some clue as to what's going on here.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
D) Hmm, I don't know about that. The output might not give us all the details, but there has to be some clue as to what's going on here.
JE
Jeff
1 year ago
C) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.
EV
Eveline
1 year ago
A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.
CH
Chu
1 year ago
B) Come on, that's just silly. The question clearly states that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are user VPLSs, so they have to be configured as such.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
C) That's the most likely reason. If VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, it could definitely lead to unexpected behavior.
AR
Arlene
1 year ago
C) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.
AD
Adria
1 year ago
B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.
MA
Maricela
1 year ago
A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.
AN
Andra
2 years ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Option C does make sense too.
AL
Alonso
2 years ago
A) Definitely not the case. The question clearly states that VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections, so it has to be configured as a management VPLS.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
D) VPLS 100 must be configured as a management VPLS since it was created for redundant spoke-SDP connections.
LE
Leandro
1 year ago
C) It's possible that there is a problem with the configuration that is not evident from the output.
MA
Maricela
1 year ago
B) Maybe VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as VPLS 100.
JO
Jospeh
1 year ago
A) The issue might be that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not configured correctly as user VPLSs.
EL
Elza
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct answer.
AN
Andra
2 years ago
I think the most likely reason is option A.