Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 12 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 12

Click on the exhibit below.

Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?

AVPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.

BVPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.

CVPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.

DBased on the output there is now way of telling if there is a problem with the configuration.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Erick at Apr 20, 2023, 01:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Joaquin

4 months ago

No way to tell from the output? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

4 months ago

I doubt it's option C; they should be using the same spoke-SDPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

4 months ago

Wait, are VPLS 10 and 20 really not user VPLS? That sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patria

4 months ago

I think it's definitely option A. Makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

4 months ago

VPLS 100 needs to be properly configured as a management VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

5 months ago

I feel like option D could be a trick; sometimes the output doesn't give enough info to pinpoint the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question where the spoke-SDPs were mismatched, so option C seems plausible, but I need to double-check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dolores

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think if VPLS 10 and 20 aren't set up as user VPLS, that could definitely cause issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

5 months ago

I remember something about management VPLS needing to be properly configured, so option A might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the concepts before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

5 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about SHA-1 in my cryptography class. I believe the answer is 160 bits, so I'll select option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. The tool description seems to match Kismet, which is a wireless network discovery tool that can be used to crack encryption keys.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coletta

5 months ago

I think trade credit is the most common for small firms, but I'm not 100% sure if it provides the largest amount.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

5 months ago

I'm almost certain it's not the line group, but I keep second-guessing myself between the hunt pilot and the route group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

9 months ago

Wait, did someone say 'management VPLS'? I thought we were talking about a 'management VPLC' (very particular lunch choices)!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tu

9 months ago

D) Hmm, I don't know about that. The output might not give us all the details, but there has to be some clue as to what's going on here.

upvoted 0 times

Fletcher

8 months ago

D) Hmm, I don't know about that. The output might not give us all the details, but there has to be some clue as to what's going on here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeff

8 months ago

C) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alesia

8 months ago

B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eveline

9 months ago

A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

10 months ago

B) Come on, that's just silly. The question clearly states that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are user VPLSs, so they have to be configured as such.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

10 months ago

C) That's the most likely reason. If VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, it could definitely lead to unexpected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

Arlene

9 months ago

C) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adria

9 months ago

B) VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

9 months ago

A) VPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

10 months ago

Hmm, that's a good point. Option C does make sense too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

11 months ago

A) Definitely not the case. The question clearly states that VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections, so it has to be configured as a management VPLS.

upvoted 0 times