MENU
Which of the following statements about standalone pokers and CFHP policers is FALSE?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
GA
Galen
12 months ago
Both types using FIR buckets? Sounds right to me!
LA
Laurena
12 months ago
CFHP policers can adjust PIR rates, that's a big plus!
EU
Eun
12 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought they both had some kind of arbiter.
EL
Elke
1 year ago
Totally agree, that's a key difference!
LO
Louann
1 year ago
A standalone policer really doesn't have a parent arbiter.
LA
Lavonda
1 year ago
I recall that CFHP policers can adjust their PIR rate, which makes B sound true. So maybe C or D is the false statement?
KA
Kandis
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the FIR bucket part in C. I thought both types used it, but I could be wrong.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like both types of policers do use output queues, so D might be the false one.
LU
Luz
1 year ago
I think I remember that standalone policers don't have a parent arbiter, so A seems true. But I'm not completely sure about the details of CFHP.
SH
Sharmaine
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between carrying costs and other inventory-related expenses.
NA
Nakita
1 year ago
Option D with the Lambda function capturing image fragments seems a bit more complex. I'm not sure if that would introduce too much latency for the real-time detection requirement. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons carefully.