Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 11 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 11
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Which of the following statements about standalone pokers and CFHP policers is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tarra at May 07, 2022, 07:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Galen
5 months ago
Both types using FIR buckets? Sounds right to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
6 months ago
CFHP policers can adjust PIR rates, that's a big plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
6 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought they both had some kind of arbiter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
6 months ago
Totally agree, that's a key difference!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
6 months ago
A standalone policer really doesn't have a parent arbiter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
I recall that CFHP policers can adjust their PIR rate, which makes B sound true. So maybe C or D is the false statement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the FIR bucket part in C. I thought both types used it, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like both types of policers do use output queues, so D might be the false one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
7 months ago
I think I remember that standalone policers don't have a parent arbiter, so A seems true. But I'm not completely sure about the details of CFHP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between carrying costs and other inventory-related expenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
7 months ago
Option D with the Lambda function capturing image fragments seems a bit more complex. I'm not sure if that would introduce too much latency for the real-time detection requirement. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel