MENU
Redundant spoke-SDPs are used between 2 Metro networks for redundancy. How can load balancing be achieved across the redundant spoke-SDPs?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
LI
Linn
10 months ago
I've seen B work well in practice, so I'm all for it!
IN
In
10 months ago
Two management VPLS sounds complicated, but could work.
GE
Genevive
10 months ago
I disagree, RSTP is more efficient for this.
VA
Val
11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying there's no load balancing possible? (option C)
FA
Fabiola
11 months ago
I think option B is the way to go with 802.1D-2004.
PA
Pamella
11 months ago
I thought we discussed using multiple management VPLS for redundancy, so option D might be the right choice.
NI
Nilsa
11 months ago
I feel like I read that load balancing might not be possible with redundant spoke-SDPs, but I can't recall the details.
RE
Ressie
11 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, especially with 802.1D-2004. We practiced something similar in class.
JE
Jesusa
12 months ago
I remember something about RSTP, but I'm not sure if it applies here for load balancing.
TE
Terrilyn
12 months ago
This is a great question. I feel pretty confident in my understanding of load balancing across redundant spoke-SDPs. I'll go with option A.
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between RSTP and 802.1D-2004. I'll have to make sure I understand the implications of each before selecting an answer.
GL
Glenna
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is using a management VPLS to control the SDP blocking. I'll go with option D.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure I fully understand the concept of redundant spoke-SDPs. I'll have to review that before attempting this.
UL
Ula
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
WA
Wava
1 year ago
I think option C is incorrect, there must be a way to achieve load balancing.
MI
Ming
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think load balancing is important for network efficiency.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go.
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I tried to load balance my home network. Ended up just unplugging half the cables. But this VPLS thing sounds way more professional.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
I was thinking C, but now that I think about it, using two VPLSes like in D makes a lot more sense. Clever solution!
SH
Shelton
1 year ago
I think option A is the correct answer.
DO
Dorethea
1 year ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Using two management VPLSes with RSTP would allow for load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.
AL
Albina
1 year ago
That makes sense. Having two management VPLSes with RSTP blocking different SDPs for different VPLS services would help achieve load balancing.
LI
Linn
1 year ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Using two management VPLSes with RSTP would allow for load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.