Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 11 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 11
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Redundant spoke-SDPs are used between 2 Metro networks for redundancy. How can load balancing be achieved across the redundant spoke-SDPs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Luther at Jul 09, 2025, 10:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Linn
4 months ago
I've seen B work well in practice, so I'm all for it!
upvoted 0 times
...
In
4 months ago
Two management VPLS sounds complicated, but could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
4 months ago
I disagree, RSTP is more efficient for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
Wait, are we really saying there's no load balancing possible? (option C)
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
5 months ago
I think option B is the way to go with 802.1D-2004.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
5 months ago
I thought we discussed using multiple management VPLS for redundancy, so option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
5 months ago
I feel like I read that load balancing might not be possible with redundant spoke-SDPs, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, especially with 802.1D-2004. We practiced something similar in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
6 months ago
I remember something about RSTP, but I'm not sure if it applies here for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
This is a great question. I feel pretty confident in my understanding of load balancing across redundant spoke-SDPs. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between RSTP and 802.1D-2004. I'll have to make sure I understand the implications of each before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is using a management VPLS to control the SDP blocking. I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure I fully understand the concept of redundant spoke-SDPs. I'll have to review that before attempting this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
9 months ago
I think option C is incorrect, there must be a way to achieve load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think load balancing is important for network efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 months ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I tried to load balance my home network. Ended up just unplugging half the cables. But this VPLS thing sounds way more professional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 months ago
I was thinking C, but now that I think about it, using two VPLSes like in D makes a lot more sense. Clever solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
9 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
9 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Using two management VPLSes with RSTP would allow for load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.
upvoted 0 times
Albina
8 months ago
That makes sense. Having two management VPLSes with RSTP blocking different SDPs for different VPLS services would help achieve load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
8 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Using two management VPLSes with RSTP would allow for load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel