Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

Posted by Annice on Feb 06, 2025 at 04:07 AM

Click the exhibit button below. A service provider has applied the SAP-ingress policy configuration below on his customer's SAP. The service provider notices that all of the customer's traffic is being dropped at the SAP-ingress. Which of the following actions can resolve the problem, if applied on its own? (Choose three)

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
GI
Gilma 11 months ago
Setting traffic classification to in-profile sounds like a solid move too!
GR
Graciela 11 months ago
I thought mapping AF traffic to queue 1 was the solution?
DO
Dominque 11 months ago
Wait, can just changing the priority mode really help?
JA
Jaime 11 months ago
Totally agree, that should fix the bandwidth issue.
GA
Garry 12 months ago
Setting the CIR of queue 3 is a must!
SK
Skye 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that adjusting the high-priority-only value could affect traffic flow, but I can't remember the details.
YV
Yvette 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where traffic classification was key. Setting packets to in-profile might be a good move.
LU
Luis 1 year ago
I think using priority mode could help, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the best option here.
BA
Barney 1 year ago
I remember something about setting the CIR for queues, but I'm not sure if it needs to be non-zero for all cases.
DO
Dorinda 1 year ago
Mapping AF traffic to queue 1 could also be a good approach to try. Might be worth experimenting with that option too.
TA
Tawanna 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the high-priority-only value. Does that need to be adjusted as well? I'll have to double-check the details of that parameter.
DI
Dierdre 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Setting the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value, setting queue 3 to priority mode, and setting the traffic classification to in-profile seem like the most likely options to try.
SH
Sheldon 1 year ago
Hmm, the question mentions that all traffic is being dropped at the SAP-ingress. I wonder if adjusting the queue settings could help resolve that.
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the policy configuration and think through the possible solutions.
MA
Martina 1 year ago
Okay, so we've got a bunch of options here, but I feel like the answer is hidden in plain sight. Time to put on my detective hat and figure this out!
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Martina
C) Set the traffic classification of packets to in-profile.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Martina
B) Set queue 3 to use priority mode.
NI
Nichelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Martina
A) Set the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value corresponding to the customer's expected bandwidth requirements.
KA
Karina 1 year ago
Mapping AF traffic to queue 1? Why would that help with the SAP-ingress policy? Seems a bit random.
VA
Valentine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Karina
User3: Maybe setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile could also make a difference.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Karina
User2: Yeah, that could ensure the traffic is not dropped at the SAP-ingress.
ST
Steffanie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Karina
User1: Setting the CIR of queue 3 to match the customer's bandwidth requirements could help.
DI
Diane 1 year ago
High-priority-only to 0? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I bet that would just make the problem worse.
SA
Sarina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
User 3: Mapping AF traffic to queue 1 might be a good solution too.
AD
Adell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
User 2: I think setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile could also work.
CA
Candra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Diane
User 1: Maybe setting the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value would help.
HA
Hayley 1 year ago
Setting the traffic classification to in-profile? That's an interesting one, I wonder how that would affect the overall configuration.
KA
Kallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
User 3: Mapping AF traffic to queue 1 might be worth trying as well.
TH
Theola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
User 2: Maybe adjusting the CIR of queue 3 could also make a difference.
MA
Marge 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
User 1: Setting the traffic classification to in-profile can help resolve the issue.
CA
Cassie 2 years ago
Priority mode for queue 3? Interesting, that could help prioritize the traffic and avoid the drops.
DA
Dacia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
E) Map AF traffic to queue 1
ET
Ethan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
B) Set queue 3 to use priority mode.
LU
Lura 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
A) Set the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value corresponding to the customer's expected bandwidth requirements.
EM
Emilio 2 years ago
Hmm, setting the CIR of queue 3 seems like the obvious choice here. If the bandwidth requirements aren't being met, that's probably the root cause.
DO
Doyle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emilio
User 2: Agreed, that should help meet the customer's bandwidth requirements.
FI
Fidelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emilio
User 1: I think setting the CIR of queue 3 is the way to go.
DE
Deane 2 years ago
What about setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile? That could also resolve the issue.
CO
Coral 2 years ago
I agree with Nickole. It could ensure the customer's bandwidth requirements are met.
NI
Nickole 2 years ago
I think setting the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value might help.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel