Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-C02 Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Click the exhibit button below. A service provider has applied the SAP-ingress policy configuration below on his customer's SAP. The service provider notices that all of the customer's traffic is being dropped at the SAP-ingress. Which of the following actions can resolve the problem, if applied on its own? (Choose three)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Martina
1 months ago
Okay, so we've got a bunch of options here, but I feel like the answer is hidden in plain sight. Time to put on my detective hat and figure this out!
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
7 days ago
B) Set queue 3 to use priority mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
10 days ago
A) Set the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value corresponding to the customer's expected bandwidth requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karina
1 months ago
Mapping AF traffic to queue 1? Why would that help with the SAP-ingress policy? Seems a bit random.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
6 days ago
User3: Maybe setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile could also make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
17 days ago
User2: Yeah, that could ensure the traffic is not dropped at the SAP-ingress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
20 days ago
User1: Setting the CIR of queue 3 to match the customer's bandwidth requirements could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diane
2 months ago
High-priority-only to 0? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I bet that would just make the problem worse.
upvoted 0 times
Sarina
12 days ago
User 3: Mapping AF traffic to queue 1 might be a good solution too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 months ago
User 2: I think setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 months ago
User 1: Maybe setting the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value would help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hayley
2 months ago
Setting the traffic classification to in-profile? That's an interesting one, I wonder how that would affect the overall configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
1 months ago
User 3: Mapping AF traffic to queue 1 might be worth trying as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
1 months ago
User 2: Maybe adjusting the CIR of queue 3 could also make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 months ago
User 1: Setting the traffic classification to in-profile can help resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Priority mode for queue 3? Interesting, that could help prioritize the traffic and avoid the drops.
upvoted 0 times
Dacia
1 months ago
E) Map AF traffic to queue 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 months ago
B) Set queue 3 to use priority mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
2 months ago
A) Set the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value corresponding to the customer's expected bandwidth requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
2 months ago
Hmm, setting the CIR of queue 3 seems like the obvious choice here. If the bandwidth requirements aren't being met, that's probably the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
Doyle
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that should help meet the customer's bandwidth requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
2 months ago
User 1: I think setting the CIR of queue 3 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deane
2 months ago
What about setting the traffic classification of packets to in-profile? That could also resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
2 months ago
I agree with Nickole. It could ensure the customer's bandwidth requirements are met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
2 months ago
I think setting the CIR of queue 3 to a non-zero value might help.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel