Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-AI1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Posted by Donte on Jul 09, 2023 at 08:52 PM

Which of the following commands allows the action associated with a task to be run multiple times over a list of items?

Suggested Answer: B

containers in YANG modules can be thought of asbranchesin a tree, while leaves are the end of a branch where the information will sit.


Get Premium 4A0-AI1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
46 comments · newest first
CA
Carlene 11 months ago
A is the standard for looping through lists, no doubt!
MA
Matt 11 months ago
Wait, can concurrency really do that? I’m not so sure.
VI
Vivienne 11 months ago
A is correct, but I’m surprised it’s not more commonly known.
CH
Chery 12 months ago
I thought it was D, count. Seems like it can do that too.
CA
Carla 12 months ago
Definitely A, with-items is the way to go!
JO
Jose 1 year ago
"Concurrency" sounds familiar, but I don't think it fits this question about running tasks over a list.
AL
Alyce 1 year ago
I recall that "retry" is more about handling failures, so I don't think that's the right answer.
AL
Albert 1 year ago
I might be mixing it up, but I feel like "count" could also be a possibility for running tasks multiple times.
RA
Raina 1 year ago
I think it's "with-items," but I'm not completely sure. I remember practicing something similar.
RE
Rebbecca 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have the number of eye-gouging incidents and their average duration, so I think the best dimension to measure is the rate.
EV
Eva 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is adding a distribution center, since that would expand the company's ability to serve customers.
HE
Hector 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The data model needs to meet a functional requirement, so I'll look for the "F-" prefix in the RTM. Requirement F-R0002 seems like the best match.
KA
Katlyn 1 year ago
B) concurrency? That's like trying to juggle chainsaws while riding a unicycle - sure, it's impressive, but it's not going to help you get the job done. A is the way to go, my friends.
GA
Gabriele 1 year ago
↳ replying to Katlyn
C) retry
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Katlyn
B) I agree, concurrency can be tricky to manage.
LA
Laurena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Katlyn
A) with-items
CA
Catrice 1 year ago
D) count? I mean, if you're trying to count the number of times you failed this question, that might be the right answer. But for actually running a task, A is the way to go, folks.
MA
Marguerita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
Thanks for the tip, I'll remember to use with-items next time.
ST
Stefan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
Don't worry about counting failed attempts, go with A) with-items.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
Exactly, with-items is the command you need for that.
MA
Madelyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
A is the way to go for running a task multiple times over a list of items.
LA
Laurel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
D) count
TH
Thea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
C) retry
BU
Buddy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
B) concurrency
AR
Armanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
A) with-items
PA
Paola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
D) count is not the best choice for running a task.
AG
Agustin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
C) retry is not the correct option.
MO
Moon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
B) concurrency is not the right choice.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catrice
A) with-items is the correct answer.
FA
Fairy 2 years ago
B) concurrency? Nah, that's about running tasks in parallel, not sequentially. A is the answer, no doubt about it.
EM
Emogene 2 years ago
D) count? Wow, talk about a wild guess. That's for counting the number of items, not running a task over them. A is the way to go.
CY
Cyril 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) retry because it sounds like it could be used to try the action again.
DA
Daniel 2 years ago
I agree with Marshall, using with-items allows running the action multiple times over a list.
MA
Marshall 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) with-items.
RO
Robt 2 years ago
C) retry? Really? That's for handling failed tasks, not looping through multiple items. I think the correct answer is A.
PE
Pearlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
C) retry? Really? That's for handling failed tasks, not looping through multiple items. I think the correct answer is A.
NG
Nguyet 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
I'm still leaning towards A) with-items.
FA
Fabiola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
Actually, I think it's D) count.
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
No, I'm pretty sure it's B) concurrency.
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
A) with-items
MI
Mickie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Robt
I think the correct answer is A) with-items.
MO
Mose 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) retry because it sounds like it could be used to try the action again.
SH
Shenika 2 years ago
A) with-items seems like the obvious choice here. It's designed to loop through a list of items and execute the task for each one.
SK
Skye 2 years ago
I agree with Lai, using with-items allows running the action multiple times over a list.
LA
Lai 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) with-items.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel