MENU
Which of the following statements about the recovery time for protection and restoration combined (PRC) is correct?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-255 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
HA
Hana
11 months ago
I've heard PRC can be as fast as restoration mechanisms.
GA
Gayla
11 months ago
I agree, PRC depends on the broken links for sure.
HO
Hollis
11 months ago
Wait, is it really over 50 ms? That seems high!
LE
Lemuel
11 months ago
I think PRC is definitely slower than SNCP.
CR
Cruz
12 months ago
PRC recovery time can vary based on the situation.
JO
Jordan
12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about PRC having a typical recovery time over 50 ms, but I can't remember the details.
AF
Afton
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the comparison with restoration mechanisms. I thought PRC was supposed to be faster, but now I’m not so sure.
CH
Charlene
1 year ago
I feel like we discussed how PRC's recovery time can vary based on the situation, especially with broken links.
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I think I remember that PRC is generally slower than SNCP, but I'm not entirely sure about the exact recovery times.
SA
Salena
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. PRC is designed to provide faster recovery than just restoration, but the exact time depends on the specific network topology and which links are broken. The other options seem too absolute or don't match what I remember about PRC.
EM
Emelda
1 year ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. PRC combines protection and restoration, so the recovery time should be faster than just relying on restoration alone. But I'm not sure if it's as fast as SNCP. I'll have to review the material on PRC again to be sure.
AN
An
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. The recovery time for PRC depends on the specific broken links in the network, so it's not a fixed value like the other options suggest.
JO
Jonell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I think the recovery time for PRC is faster than 50 ms, but I'm not sure if it's as fast as SNCP or restoration mechanisms. I'll have to think this through carefully.
NI
Nicolette
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between Custom Vision and Computer Vision. I'll have to think it through carefully to make sure I pick the right service for the job.
MI
Ming
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Disabling a user in Active Directory and the impact on Azure AD authentication doesn't seem straightforward. I'll need to carefully read through the details and options to make sure I understand the best approach.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I'm convinced that high levels of redundant stock is definitely not the answer here. It seems counterintuitive to effective inventory management.
CA
Carol
1 year ago
Hmm, maybe the question writer is a time traveler from the 90s. 50 ms? That's so last century!
EL
Elke
1 year ago
C) PRC has a recovery time that depends on the broken links.
FR
Francoise
1 year ago
B) PRC is as fast as restoration mechanisms.
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
A) PRC can be as fast as sub-network connection protection (SNCP)
JA
Jacquline
1 year ago
D, really? I'd hate to have more than 50 ms of downtime. That's like an eternity in the digital world.
OS
Osvaldo
1 year ago
C seems the most reasonable to me. The recovery time does depend on the specific network conditions, doesn't it?
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
Yes, the recovery time can vary based on the network conditions.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
C) PRC has a recovery time that depends on the broken links.
SH
Sherman
1 year ago
A) PRC can be as fast as sub-network connection protection (SNCP)
DO
Dona
1 year ago
B sounds good in theory, but I'm not sure it's always true in practice. Recovery times can be tricky to predict.
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
User 3: B) PRC is as fast as restoration mechanisms.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
User 2: C) PRC has a recovery time that depends on the broken links.
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
User 1: A) PRC can be as fast as sub-network connection protection (SNCP)
CO
Cory
2 years ago
A? That's a bold claim. I don't think PRC can be as fast as SNCP. Maybe the question writer is feeling a bit too optimistic today.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
Yeah, it's hard to believe that PRC could be as fast as SNCP.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
Maybe the recovery time for PRC depends on the specific network setup.
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
I agree, PRC being as fast as SNCP doesn't sound realistic.
AL
Alfred
1 year ago
I think you're right, A does seem like a bold claim.
BA
Barb
2 years ago
But PRC is not always as fast as SNCP, it depends on the specific network configuration and the location of the broken links.
MA
Maurine
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe A) PRC can be as fast as sub-network connection protection (SNCP) is the correct statement.
BA
Barb
2 years ago
I think the correct statement is C) PRC has a recovery time that depends on the broken links.