Nokia 4A0-255 Exam - Topic 3 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-255 exam

Question #: 52
Topic #: 3

Consider the exhibit shows the standard 8-step network design process. Suppose that you have used this process to design a Green filed network, which has been commissioned and is in operation. The customer now requests an extension to the network to accommodate more steps and traffic. Which steps are not required when designing such an extension?

AStep 2(analyze Traffic Demand and Step 4 ( Define Network Topology)

BStep (Define Network Architecture ) and Step 5( Evaluate Traffic Demand on Architecture)

CStep2 (Analyze Available) and Step 8 (Analyze Cost).

DThe steps to be followed depended on the requirement of the network extension.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lawrence at Sep 15, 2024, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-255 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Janna

3 months ago

Yeah, but I feel like some analysis is always needed, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

3 months ago

I think it depends on the specifics of the extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yaeko

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure about skipping Step 8? Cost analysis is important!

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

4 months ago

I agree, those steps are for initial design, not extensions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

4 months ago

Definitely don't need Step 2 and Step 4 for an extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

4 months ago

I agree that it depends on the specific requirements of the extension, so maybe we need to consider that before deciding which steps to skip.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilona

4 months ago

I feel like Steps 2 and 8 could be skipped, but I’m not completely confident about the cost analysis part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenifer

4 months ago

I'm a bit unsure, but I remember that defining the network architecture might not be necessary if we're just extending an existing setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elden

5 months ago

I think we might not need Step 2 and Step 4 since we already analyzed traffic demand for the initial design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

5 months ago

This is a good test of our understanding of the network design process. I feel pretty confident I can identify the steps that wouldn't be required for an extension project versus a brand new network design. I'll make sure to read the question carefully and think through the differences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederic

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. For an extension, you wouldn't need to do the full analysis of traffic demand or define the network topology from scratch since that's already been done. The key is focusing on the changes needed to accommodate the expansion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to really understand the difference between designing a new network and extending an existing one. The steps might be different, but I'm not sure which ones can be skipped.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronica

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the network design process steps and think about which ones would be necessary for an extension versus a new greenfield design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

5 months ago

Noise usually messes with clarity, so it might be about brightness levels, right? Or maybe I'm mixing it up with another topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

1 year ago

I'm going with D. Trying to shortcut the design process is a surefire way to end up with a network that doesn't meet the customer's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

1 year ago

Option D makes the most sense. You can't just assume you can skip steps without understanding the full scope of the extension. That's a recipe for disaster.

upvoted 0 times

Brittni

1 year ago

That's a recipe for disaster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

1 year ago

You can't just assume you can skip steps without understanding the full scope of the extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

1 year ago

Option D makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aja

1 year ago

But wouldn't Step 2 (Analyze Traffic Demand) still be important for any network extension?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

1 year ago

I agree with Glory, it makes sense to customize the design process based on the specific needs of the network extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

1 year ago

Hah, I bet the designer is wishing they went with option A - skip the traffic analysis and network topology definition. That's the easy way out!

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 year ago

D is the way to go. Each network extension is unique, so we need to evaluate the specific requirements before determining which steps are necessary.

upvoted 0 times

Eulah

1 year ago

I agree, flexibility is key when it comes to extending a network to accommodate more traffic and steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irving

1 year ago

Absolutely, it's important to tailor the design process to the specific needs of the network extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

1 year ago

D is the way to go. Each network extension is unique, so we need to evaluate the specific requirements before determining which steps are necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

1 year ago

I think the steps to be followed depended on the requirement of the network extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is D. When designing an extension to an existing network, the steps required will depend on the specific requirements of the extension. We can't just assume certain steps can be skipped.

upvoted 0 times