Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-255 Exam - Topic 11 Question 16 Discussion

Consider the exhibit that shows a network with a full mesh fiber structure. Link weights indicate the cost. Future services can be requested between any node pair.Which of the following topology represents a minimum cost design (minimum overall fiber cost) where link failure survivability is ensured?A)B)C)D)
B) Option B
A) Option A
C) Option C
D) Option D

Nokia 4A0-255 Exam - Topic 11 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-255 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 11
[All 4A0-255 Questions]

Consider the exhibit that shows a network with a full mesh fiber structure. Link weights indicate the cost. Future services can be requested between any node pair.

Which of the following topology represents a minimum cost design (minimum overall fiber cost) where link failure survivability is ensured?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rickie at Dec 25, 2022, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-255 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mitsue
8 months ago
Are we sure any of these options guarantee survivability? Seems sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
9 months ago
Just a heads up, all options have different link weights, so costs vary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
9 months ago
Surprised that no one mentioned Option D, it seems solid!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
9 months ago
I disagree, I think Option B has better survivability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
9 months ago
Option C looks like the best choice for minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
9 months ago
I recall that for minimum cost designs, we should avoid unnecessary links. Option A seems too dense, but I’m not confident about my choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the link weights. Did we cover how to calculate the minimum cost while ensuring survivability? I think I might lean towards Option D, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
9 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before. If survivability is key, we might need to look for redundancy in the links. Maybe Option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how a full mesh topology can be expensive, but we need to ensure survivability. I think it might be Option B, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is understanding what "minority interests" means in the context of a subsidiary. That's the ownership stake held by people outside the controlling entity, so B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
10 months ago
I feel confident I can handle this. Placing the VMs in separate availability zones and using the same virtual network should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
The "No Questions" sign reminds me of a practice question we had about reinforcement strategies. Does that make it a negative reinforcer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
10 months ago
I've got this one! HDHPs are defined by having higher deductibles, so the answer must be that they don't cost more than traditional coverage. I'm confident I can get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel