Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-255 Exam - Topic 11 Question 16 Discussion

Consider the exhibit that shows a network with a full mesh fiber structure. Link weights indicate the cost. Future services can be requested between any node pair.Which of the following topology represents a minimum cost design (minimum overall fiber cost) where link failure survivability is ensured?A)B)C)D)
B) Option B
A) Option A
C) Option C
D) Option D

Nokia 4A0-255 Exam - Topic 11 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-255 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 11
[All 4A0-255 Questions]

Consider the exhibit that shows a network with a full mesh fiber structure. Link weights indicate the cost. Future services can be requested between any node pair.

Which of the following topology represents a minimum cost design (minimum overall fiber cost) where link failure survivability is ensured?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rickie at Dec 25, 2022, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-255 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mitsue
7 months ago
Are we sure any of these options guarantee survivability? Seems sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
7 months ago
Just a heads up, all options have different link weights, so costs vary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
7 months ago
Surprised that no one mentioned Option D, it seems solid!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
8 months ago
I disagree, I think Option B has better survivability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
8 months ago
Option C looks like the best choice for minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
8 months ago
I recall that for minimum cost designs, we should avoid unnecessary links. Option A seems too dense, but I’m not confident about my choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the link weights. Did we cover how to calculate the minimum cost while ensuring survivability? I think I might lean towards Option D, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
8 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before. If survivability is key, we might need to look for redundancy in the links. Maybe Option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how a full mesh topology can be expensive, but we need to ensure survivability. I think it might be Option B, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is understanding what "minority interests" means in the context of a subsidiary. That's the ownership stake held by people outside the controlling entity, so B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
8 months ago
I feel confident I can handle this. Placing the VMs in separate availability zones and using the same virtual network should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
The "No Questions" sign reminds me of a practice question we had about reinforcement strategies. Does that make it a negative reinforcer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
8 months ago
I've got this one! HDHPs are defined by having higher deductibles, so the answer must be that they don't cost more than traditional coverage. I'm confident I can get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel