Nokia Exam 4A0-205 Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-205 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 4

[All 4A0-205 Questions]

What is a Shared Risk Group (SRG)?

AA set of fibers that share the same latency risk

BA set of boards that share the same failure risk

CA set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure

DA set of network resources that share a common failure risk

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

According to the Nokia Optical Networking documentation, a Shared Risk Group (SRG) is defined as 'a set of network resources that share a common failure risk. When a resource in an SRG fails, the other resources in the group are also affected.' This can include fibers, boards, nodes, and other network resources. The SRG concept is used in network design and protection mechanisms to ensure survivability and minimal impact on service in case of a failure.

by Fabiola at Jul 03, 2024, 08:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-205 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Galen

2 days ago

I think it's more about latency than failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

8 days ago

It's definitely about shared failure risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlie

14 days ago

I’m leaning towards option C because it sounds familiar, but I might be mixing it up with something else I studied about shared risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

19 days ago

I feel like I saw something about fibers and latency risks in my notes, but that doesn't seem to fit with what I remember about SRGs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

24 days ago

I remember practicing a question about failure risks, and I think it had to do with network resources. Could it be option D?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

1 month ago

I think a Shared Risk Group is related to nodes, but I'm not entirely sure if it's about hardware failure or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Becky

1 month ago

Okay, I think I've got this. A shared risk group is a set of network elements that are vulnerable to the same potential point of failure. Option D sounds like the best description of that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deane

1 month ago

Ah, I remember discussing shared risk groups in class. I believe they refer to a set of network resources that share a common risk of failure. Let me double-check the options to confirm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

1 month ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know shared risk groups have to do with network reliability, but I can't quite remember the exact definition. I'll have to think this through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alba

1 month ago

This seems like a straightforward networking question. I'll read through the options carefully and try to recall what I've learned about shared risk groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

1 month ago

This looks straightforward. I'll just need to use the kubectl logs command to extract the relevant log lines and then redirect them to the specified file.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

1 month ago

I've got this! Blockchains work best when they are combined with other technologies, like cloud computing or IoT. That's the key to unlocking their full potential.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

1 month ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the answer is NBTSTAT since it's specifically designed to list NetBIOS names and IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marci

1 year ago

Is there a 'None of the above' option? I mean, who even came up with these choices? They're all a bit... 'meh'.

upvoted 0 times

Margart

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) A set of network resources that share a common failure risk makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleisha

1 year ago

I think it's C) A set of nodes that share a common risk of hardware failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamar

1 year ago

I agree, these options are not very clear.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thora

1 year ago

Option D all the way! A set of network resources that share a common failure risk. Redundancy is key, folks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 year ago

I'm going with A. A set of fibers that share the same latency risk. Gotta love those low-latency network connections!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. A set of boards that share the same failure risk or a set of network resources that share a common failure risk. I'll go with D, it sounds more inclusive.

upvoted 0 times