Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-205 Exam - Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Posted by Kaitlyn on Apr 23, 2023 at 11:12 AM

Which of the following applications is related to Wavelength Tracker tool?

Suggested Answer: B

The EPT run design command can remove previously designed elements, but the user is prompted to choose whether to delete them or leave them intact. This allows the user to progress their design while still keeping the existing elements in place. If the user selects to leave the existing elements, then they will remain in the same slots. If GMPLS nodes are used, the existing slots cannot change as they are controlled by another manager (GMRE).


Get Premium 4A0-205 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
RI
Ricarda 11 months ago
Wait, I thought it was for correcting errors?
BR
Brittney 12 months ago
A is just about collecting logs, not tracking.
ST
Stevie 12 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, C sounds plausible as well.
RU
Rupert 1 year ago
Yeah, B seems right to me too!
BI
Billy 1 year ago
I think it's definitely about tracking the protection path.
CL
Clarinda 1 year ago
Collecting logs seems like a possible function, but I thought the Wavelength Tracker was more focused on tracking rather than logging.
CR
Cruz 1 year ago
I feel like option B sounds familiar, but I might be mixing it up with something else we studied.
ZA
Zack 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about tracking optical power, but I can't recall if that was related to the Wavelength Tracker tool.
ER
Eric 1 year ago
I think the Wavelength Tracker is mostly about monitoring paths, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for protection paths or something else.
EL
Elenor 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the playbook has different configuration options, but I can't quite recall the specifics of the "For Each Input" feature. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand it correctly.
IV
Ivory 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but wasn't there something about fitting strategy to the environment? That makes me think maybe A could be valid too.
LU
Lucille 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A, non-sequential, since that sounds like it would change the order. But I'm not 100% confident on that. Indexes can be tricky, so I'll have to double-check my notes before answering.
DO
Domonique 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Cisco ACI is designed for scalable, flexible data center networking, and the VXLAN VNI to multicast group mapping is a key part of that. I'm going to go with option C.
PH
Phyliss 1 year ago
Hmm, the known bug with the application freezing is concerning. I'll need to consider options that can handle that scenario and ensure the order is successfully submitted.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with Option C. Tracing the optical power seems like the most relevant application for a Wavelength Tracker tool. Unless, of course, it's secretly a tool for tracking rogue wavelengths on the loose!
LE
Leanora 1 year ago
Option D - 'Correcting errors related to wavelength inconsistencies' - that's a good one! I'd love to see a tool that can just 'fix' wavelength problems with the press of a button.
AL
Alisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
C) Tracing the end-to-end wavelength optical power
NA
Nancey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
B) Tracking the protection path for a specific wavelength
PE
Penney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
A) Collecting logs related to possible issue affecting a wavelength path
NA
Nada 1 year ago
Haha, 'Wavelength Tracker' - sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie! But in all seriousness, I think Option C is the way to go.
GL
Glenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nada
I agree with you, Option C seems to be the most relevant.
RI
Rima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nada
I would go with Option B for sure.
HY
Hyman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nada
I think Option A is the correct choice.
CO
Cornell 1 year ago
I'm tempted to go with Option B. Tracking the protection path for a specific wavelength seems like an important capability for a Wavelength Tracker tool.
WI
William 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I think Option C could also be relevant, tracing the end-to-end wavelength optical power.
BR
Brett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I'm not sure, I think Option A might also be related to the Wavelength Tracker tool.
AR
Arleen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I agree, that capability would be crucial for a Wavelength Tracker tool.
PA
Pamella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I think Option B is the right choice. It's important to track the protection path for a specific wavelength.
MA
Madonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I see your point. Option C does sound important too. It's a tough choice between A and C.
BL
Blossom 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
Hmm, that's a good point. Option C does seem like a useful capability as well. What do you think?
EL
Elfriede 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I agree with you, Option A does sound important. But I'm leaning towards Option C. Tracing the end-to-end wavelength optical power seems like a key feature.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cornell
I think Option A might be more relevant. Collecting logs related to possible issues affecting a wavelength path could be crucial.
RO
Rodolfo 2 years ago
Option C sounds like the right answer to me. Tracing the end-to-end optical power of a wavelength seems like it would be a key function of a Wavelength Tracker tool.
RE
Refugia 2 years ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I see why you would choose that.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Tracing the end-to-end wavelength optical power.
RE
Refugia 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Collecting logs related to possible issue affecting a wavelength path.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel